Angular 2.0 Website

#1

Post by hswolff » Thu, Mar 05, 2015, 4:25 PM UTC

Angular 2.0 Website
angular.io

Re: Angular 2.0 Website

#2

Post by rdsubhas » Thu, Mar 05, 2015, 4:58 PM UTC

And all hell breaks loose again in the JavaScript world.

Re: Angular 2.0 Website

#3

Post by ibero » Thu, Mar 05, 2015, 4:59 PM UTC

their about page is broken, cutting off text of the bio at almost all screen sizes.

there is a weird "rawgit traffic error" banner across the site.

Re: Angular 2.0 Website

#4

Post by aberatiu » Thu, Mar 05, 2015, 5:02 PM UTC

Backward compatibility down the drain.

Re: Angular 2.0 Website

#5

Post by martingordon » Thu, Mar 05, 2015, 5:04 PM UTC

> Angular 2 is currently in Alpha Preview. We recommend using Angular 1.X for production applications.

Not sure how they can "recommend" 1.X when it's completely incompatible with 2.0. Might as well recommend Ember, React, or literally anything else.

Re: Angular 2.0 Website

#6

Post by woah » Thu, Mar 05, 2015, 5:06 PM UTC

rdsubhas wrote: post #2

And all hell breaks loose again in the JavaScript world.

The original angular seemed to mostly be advocated for by people new to JavaScript.

Re: Angular 2.0 Website

#7

Post by kylestlb » Thu, Mar 05, 2015, 5:08 PM UTC

martingordon wrote: post #5

> Angular 2 is currently in Alpha Preview. We recommend using Angular 1.X for production applications. Not sure how they can "recommend" 1.X when it's completely incompatible with 2.0. Might as well recommend Ember, React, or literally anything else.

Why would they recommend something other than angular on the angular homepage?

Re: Angular 2.0 Website

#8

Post by dmarg » Thu, Mar 05, 2015, 5:10 PM UTC

martingordon wrote: post #5

> Angular 2 is currently in Alpha Preview. We recommend using Angular 1.X for production applications. Not sure how they can "recommend" 1.X when it's completely incompatible with 2.0. Might as well recommend Ember, React, or literally anything else.

At ng-conf in the opening remarks they talked about how they plan to have people migrate from 1.X to 2.0. From what I understand if you start using the new router in Angular 1.4 then that will be the router for 2.0 which will allow you to use Angular 2.0 with 1.X components as you slowly migrate each 1.X component to 2.0. I think this is pretty reasonable.

Re: Angular 2.0 Website

#9

Post by [deleted] » Thu, Mar 05, 2015, 5:10 PM UTC

kylestlb wrote: post #7

martingordon wrote: post #5

> Angular 2 is currently in Alpha Preview. We recommend using Angular 1.X for production applications. Not sure how they can "recommend" 1.X when it's completely incompatible with 2.0. Might as well recommend Ember, React, or literally anything else.

Why would they recommend something other than angular on the angular homepage?

[deleted]

Re: Angular 2.0 Website

#10

Post by mooredinty » Thu, Mar 05, 2015, 5:11 PM UTC

martingordon wrote: post #5

> Angular 2 is currently in Alpha Preview. We recommend using Angular 1.X for production applications. Not sure how they can "recommend" 1.X when it's completely incompatible with 2.0. Might as well recommend Ember, React, or literally anything else.

> Not sure how they can "recommend" 1.X when it's completely incompatible with 2.0

I'm tired of people saying this. It's simply not true. The core team has said multiple times that there will be a migration path and they just announced today that you will be able to mix v1 and v2 components within the same project.