Live data from Hacker News

“Just remove the duck” (2013)

rachelbythebay.com

331–340 of 347 posts

Re: “Just remove the duck” (2013)

#332

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I was very unhappy to find they don't sell the wired version anymore, only the non-Bluetooth wireless. Glad I bought a couple.

I have both, and I prefer the wireless. No cords, the battery lasts a long time, and I can program it on my Mac so that, when using Chrome, the extra buttons click on a link, open the link in a new tab, and switch to that tab. When will Chrome offer the option of switching to a new tab when its link is clicked on? Firefox has had it forever.

> When will Chrome offer the option of switching to a new tab when its link is clicked on? Firefox has had it forever.

When will the big browsers be programmable? I'm currently running uzbl[0] because I want to set my own hotkeys in my browser. I tried 4 different 'emacs bindings' extensions for other browsers until I just figured out that none of these is gonna get it completely right.

The good thing in all of this is that I now control the behavior and features of my browser myself. I've made features that wouldn't even be possible in Firefox/Chrome. Not because it should be all that hard, but because they just don't let you actually do anything with them.

Browsers are pretty much like e-mail clients. They all suck. Some suck less than others, but it's actually striking how bad the sum total of all the browsers' usability is. Ironically I had to switch to a browser that wasn't trying to be a modern browser to get the browser experience that I wanted.

Links: [0] - http://www.uzbl.org/

Re: “Just remove the duck” (2013)

#333
post #328

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I find it likely that Jobs and Page were able to pick up on millimeter & millisecond defects. Quite possible. It's also possible that Jobs & Page made all kinds of more or less random comments, and people remembered and retold the stories about the times they were strikingly correct. I'd guess the truth is somewhere between the two.

Third plausible option for the Steve Jobs story: he knew his colleagues very well and just guessed what they did through their body-language. If I was going to pull off something like that on my boss I'm pretty sure I'd act differently than usual, and marketing/business-type people tend to be socially hyper-aware.

We could take that idea to the extreme. Perhaps Jobs knew nothing about technology; he was just highly sensitive to the body language of talented engineers. So he hired top-notch people, and then he yelled at them until he could see that the engineers knew they were doing excellent work.

Re: “Just remove the duck” (2013)

#334
post #8

A story from the time recounts that Piero Soderino, the head of the powerful Florentine Republic, even told the famously irascible Michelangelo that David's nose was much too large. Michelangelo then hid some marble dust in his hand, climbed back up his ladder and pretended to do some more "chiseling" on the offending proboscis. While he did so, he let some marble dust fall from his hand. The pompous Soderino was foo…

Not a huge Steve Jobs fan, but I had a professor who had worked as a designer under Steve Jobs and tried something similar. Steve insisted that a new mouse needed to be just a fraction of a millimetre slimmer so a person's palm was lower and closer to the work surface. They figured he was being an unreasonable "delicate genius" and returned a few days later with the identical mouse and claimed they had reworked it to…

This would be a good story if apple had ever made a mouse that was even passably good.

Re: “Just remove the duck” (2013)

#335

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I have both, and I prefer the wireless. No cords, the battery lasts a long time, and I can program it on my Mac so that, when using Chrome, the extra buttons click on a link, open the link in a new tab, and switch to that tab. When will Chrome offer the option of switching to a new tab when its link is clicked on? Firefox has had it forever.

> When will Chrome offer the option of switching to a new tab when its link is clicked on? Firefox has had it forever. When will the big browsers be programmable? I'm currently running uzbl[0] because I want to set my own hotkeys in my browser. I tried 4 different 'emacs bindings' extensions for other browsers until I just figured out that none of these is gonna get it completely right. The good thing in all of this…

If you tried pentadactyl / vimperator extensions for Firefox I'd be surprised if you found anything you couldn't program that you can acheve in uzbl.

Re: “Just remove the duck” (2013)

#336
post #329

Earlier quoted context omitted.

God I lost a bunch of hours to that game. Kinderheitstrauma.

Just out of curiosity what do you think Kinderheitstrauma is?

Well, it's one of the original stunt maps in Trackmania, but it also literally means "childhood trauma".

Re: “Just remove the duck” (2013)

#337
post #329

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Just out of curiosity what do you think Kinderheitstrauma is?

Well, it's one of the original stunt maps in Trackmania, but it also literally means "childhood trauma".

Oh I see. Sorry, I'm german, and the word seemed out of context to me. Thanks for clearing that up :)

Re: “Just remove the duck” (2013)

#338

I worked at a deli during college, and people did this same type of thing on slices. By default, I'd always pick a pretty thin slice. Most people really like thinly sliced meats. The first thing you do is slice once and show them the slice, making sure it fits what they wanted. 99% of the time, people would say "thinner," I would pretend to fiddle with the knob, slice the same thickness, and they'd say "perfect!" I t…

They know. They just think you're bad at working the slicer and don't want to make that interaction an ordeal. That's what I've thought every single time I say "thinner" and they come back and it isn't thinner.

If someone asked me for it to be even thinner, I would change it. The thing is, the default setting is REALLY THIN. If you want it thinner, it becomes transparent. It ends up taking FOREVER to slice because it just shreds to some extent. It's no longer slices, but a pile of shredded meat.

Re: “Just remove the duck” (2013)

#339
post #83

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They know. They just think you're bad at working the slicer and don't want to make that interaction an ordeal. That's what I've thought every single time I say "thinner" and they come back and it isn't thinner.

This is what happens to me too. I feel bad for the wasted cold cuts. So I'll give them two tries, one attempt and one adjustment, next time I'll wait for the person who does it better.

They're not wasted. Odds and ends go into a bin to be ground up later for "salads."

Re: “Just remove the duck” (2013)

#340

I worked at a deli during college, and people did this same type of thing on slices. By default, I'd always pick a pretty thin slice. Most people really like thinly sliced meats. The first thing you do is slice once and show them the slice, making sure it fits what they wanted. 99% of the time, people would say "thinner," I would pretend to fiddle with the knob, slice the same thickness, and they'd say "perfect!" I t…

or maybe they don't want to appear rude or finnicky by pointing out that it looks the same?

I worked in a poor area. The people who live there, by and large, don't give a shit what you think of them.
Post reply on HN