An $89 remanufactured Ubuntu workstation
61–70 of 144 posts
Re: An $89 remanufactured Ubuntu workstation
#62Amazing price point. Are the computer parts refurbished? Otherwise I wonder where do you get 2GB RAM, 80GB HDD, and other older components at good prices these days? Usually, parts get cheaper as the become replaced by newer versions, but then become expensive again.
Yes, they're clearly reused parts from PCs that have been end-of-lifed by corporates. Edit: If you're in the UK and happen to want a supply of EOL computers, I suggest Morgan Computers, e.g. http://www.morgancomputers.co.uk/product_detail/14905/HP-Eli...
Re: An $89 remanufactured Ubuntu workstation
#63Earlier quoted context omitted.
He is talking about power not cost to build it.
Cost to build likely includes the cost of power, no? In other words, if building an ARM SoC costs $10, the electricity cost in the ARM SoC is under $10, so if you save $10 in electricity by running the ARM SoC, then you've offset the cost of the energy used in manufacturing.
Re: An $89 remanufactured Ubuntu workstation
#64Earlier quoted context omitted.
Until Raspberry Pi can get their power supply problems under control, they really aren't good enough to use as any kind of workstation.
They did, with the B+ in mid 2014, and the current Pi 2 with the same power design. The B+ and newer boards don't suffer the odd power supply issues that the older boards (even the B rev2) suffered. And I'm not just rehashing what someone else said; I've had one each of the original B, a rev 2 B, a B+, and now a Pi 2. I've used the same power supply on all four, and on the B+ and Pi 2 I don't have any issues with hot…
Re: An $89 remanufactured Ubuntu workstation
#65They're cheap enough that my first thought was to pick up a couple and figure out what I'd do with them later, but the disadvantage here is that they're older boxes, which means they're going to be energy hogs (for the performance point, at least). That's what makes the eco pitch interesting - they're reducing e-waste, which is good, but energy efficiency on newer boxes (especially if you just need minimal performanc…
This has been one of the most amazingly non-intuitive things for me over the years. That operating a computer that is older can be so much more inefficient than operating one that is newer, that it isn't worth it. Literally the best thing you can do is crush the chips and mine the result for gold, silver, and the few rare earths that are left over. That at least puts a finite limit on the energy consumed over it, and…
Re: An $89 remanufactured Ubuntu workstation
#66If had no fan, I'd buy one for my kids.
Judging from its performance I suspect the original Pi would have disappointed me and been nearly useless for anything I might wanted to do with it, but the Pi2's a nice little device. It's silent and it sips power. The support and software ecosystem around it is well worth a few extra bucks over similar devices (the first time it saves you even 30 minutes of hair-pulling frustration, which likely won't be long after you open the box, you'll be glad you went with a Pi)
Re: An $89 remanufactured Ubuntu workstation
#67They're cheap enough that my first thought was to pick up a couple and figure out what I'd do with them later, but the disadvantage here is that they're older boxes, which means they're going to be energy hogs (for the performance point, at least). That's what makes the eco pitch interesting - they're reducing e-waste, which is good, but energy efficiency on newer boxes (especially if you just need minimal performanc…
I deleted a post about the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jevons_paradox and how these machines were in fact not green. I was wrong. Given the right uses, like an elementary school computer lab for learning Scratch, Logo, etc; they would be fine. The problem is they are right on the cusp of the next cycle of Moore's Law, Raspberry Pi is now quad core and 1GB, it puts it in the same class as this machine. The cost of "g…
Also, as great as the RPi 2 is, I still don't think it is the same class as these machines, which have a 3x clock cycle advantage, plus much wider CPUs. For web browsing, this is going to matter way more than 4 cores.
Re: An $89 remanufactured Ubuntu workstation
#68Earlier quoted context omitted.
I agree, I love the concept, but you also have to add the cost of a monitor + keyboard + mouse AND the fact that everybody wants (needs?) a laptop these days.
"you also have to add the cost of a monitor + keyboard + mouse AND the fact that everybody wants (needs?) a laptop these days." Not really... with RDP/SSH/Telnet/etc, you can access this without the need a dedicated keyboard/mouse/monitor. Also, I can live without a laptop due to my "phablet". I already have a desktop. Something like this would be a good for hiding a server (or two) somewhere. The question is... the…
I think the target is to make this the terminal. I don't see too many people going out of their way to remote into a low spec machine like this.
Re: An $89 remanufactured Ubuntu workstation
#69Earlier quoted context omitted.
Until Raspberry Pi can get their power supply problems under control, they really aren't good enough to use as any kind of workstation.
They did, with the B+ in mid 2014, and the current Pi 2 with the same power design. The B+ and newer boards don't suffer the odd power supply issues that the older boards (even the B rev2) suffered. And I'm not just rehashing what someone else said; I've had one each of the original B, a rev 2 B, a B+, and now a Pi 2. I've used the same power supply on all four, and on the B+ and Pi 2 I don't have any issues with hot…
Unless GP is referring to the flash problem of the RPi 2.0, which is readily solved by using a case, piece of tape, or an epoxy blob (which I imagine is what will be added to the manufacturing line eventually)
Re: An $89 remanufactured Ubuntu workstation
#70Earlier quoted context omitted.
Until Raspberry Pi can get their power supply problems under control, they really aren't good enough to use as any kind of workstation.
First I've heard of this; it does need a decent USB power supply, but that's a consequence of not shipping one and expecting the user to supply one of suitable quality.