Live data from Hacker News

Introducing Pebble Time

kickstarter.com

81–90 of 403 posts

Re: Introducing Pebble Time

#81
post #68

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is way more common than you think. The most successful kickstarter campaigns usually have their demand already assessed (the number I've heard is usually 25%) before launching.

So you're saying successful "campaigns" are simply the ones using kickstarter as a pre-ordering platform? That's very sad.

Unfortunately, yes.

Re: Introducing Pebble Time

#82

"We will ship Pebble Time worldwide, with the exception of Cuba, Myanmar/Burma, Iran, Sudan, Syria, and Russia." Russia?

Doesn't the US still have an embargo on Russia for the whole Ukraine thing? I find Cuba to be interesting. I thought we ended that embargo in December.

They might have finalized the copy before that.

Re: Introducing Pebble Time

#83
post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Marketing. This will generate a lot more publicity.

Right. As a Marketing guy myself (6 years in Procter & Gamble), I'm always baffled when people in HN don't get obvious marketing moves, but in the other hand, I'm always learning so much about tech stuff that my colleagues would never get in a decade. This community is awesome.

I'm pretty sure they "get it", but agreeing with this practice is different thing. Sure, KS is as happy as everyone else, but that's not what they used to present themselves as.

Re: Introducing Pebble Time

#84
post #62

Pretty sneaky to advertise $159 and not mention the $10 shipping which makes it $169, and KS doesn't even advertise that until you've already clicked through to the 'pledge' (aka purchase, what happened to "Kickstarter is not a store"?) page. And now that the 'early tier' is gone (great UX on that, they took me to the credit card page, I entered my info, then they reloaded it and went "oops, that tier's full now tee-…

Unless you can lock in the early bird, I don't believe there's any point in pledging. I just about scraped through and pledged $179 + $10, which puts me about $20 ahead of the final cost (assuming shipping will stay the same).

Re: Introducing Pebble Time

#85
post #32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Actually, they're saying "up to" 7 days which is obnoxious because that could mean anything.

But probably more than the almost-a-day the Apple Watch is likely going to get. Being able to sleep with your watch on most nights of the week is a bigger deal than a lot of people realize.

> Being able to sleep with your watch on most nights of the week is a bigger deal than a lot of people realize.

This is huge for me and why I wear my FitBit instead of my Moto 360 most of the time. If I can wear it while I sleep I can set multiple alarms to wake me up that do not wake up the spouse or kids and it's less annoying than trying to turn a very loud beeping off.

Re: Introducing Pebble Time

#87

What I think is good about this is that they are thinking of a new paradigm for UI on a wearable. For Android Wear devices it feels like Google just decided that voice was going to take care of UI, and no decisions about physical controls needed to be made. But there are two problems: voice isn't that reliable, and more importantly, there are a lot of situations where you want to use your watch but not talk to it.

> voice isn't that reliable Maybe it's because I'm from Minnesota and sound like Don LaFontaine, but Google's voice recognition is easily 95% or better for me. Probably closer to 98%, even on spoken sentences for sending emails or texts. When I'm navigating, or trying to call someone, it's closer to 99%.

Voice recognition has improved tremendously for me as well. But what I can't seem to get over is that it's almost always slower than using my thumbs. Talking is slower than typing, plus the process time needed to interpret the voice commands. -- from a keyboard shortcut junkie

Re: Introducing Pebble Time

#88
post #60
post #45

Earlier quoted context omitted.

21 minutes later, an extra $1M.

30 minutes later and we have round 2 million dollars. This is insane, they could smash the record of the previous Pebble ($10M)

Let's see how much a successful KS project can increase due to well earned trust.

Re: Introducing Pebble Time

#90
I think that in terms of what I was expecting out of Pebbles second iteration, this was not it. I like how they did away with the mobile thinking of apps because that was simply trying to conform a watch to a mobile phones way of thinking. Even sticking to e-paper for long battery life was a good design decision but beyond that there really isn't much in innovation. The design doesn't really wow or anything same with the UI. I know some comments really liked the UI and I guess with developers updating their apps and looks to match the new watch that may improve things as well.
Post reply on HN