Live data from Hacker News

Mathematicians who died under unfortunate or unfitting circumstances

kellenmyers.org

31–40 of 41 posts

Re: Mathematicians who died under unfortunate or unfitting circumstances

#31

On a related note, "Dangerous Knowledge" is a great documentary "about four of the most brilliant mathematicians of all time, Georg Cantor, Ludwig Boltzmann, Kurt Gödel and Alan Turing, their genius, their tragic madness and their ultimate suicides". http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1520274/

Do Cantor or Gödel's deaths count as suicide? They weren't really self-inflicted, but more due to mental illness.

Thanks for mentioning the documentary: I will check it out...

Re: Mathematicians who died under unfortunate or unfitting circumstances

#33
post #32

Archimedes! Run through by a sword by an impatient soldier while he was trying to finish up a math problem instead of heeding a summons to some bureaucrat or general or something.

Ah, he is on there. The list is neither sorted alphabetically nor chronologically.

Re: Mathematicians who died under unfortunate or unfitting circumstances

#34
post #32

Archimedes! Run through by a sword by an impatient soldier while he was trying to finish up a math problem instead of heeding a summons to some bureaucrat or general or something.

I'm actually amazed that he reached the age of 75! I didn't know people could become that old back in those days. Was he an exception?

Re: Mathematicians who died under unfortunate or unfitting circumstances

#36
post #34
post #32

Archimedes! Run through by a sword by an impatient soldier while he was trying to finish up a math problem instead of heeding a summons to some bureaucrat or general or something.

I'm actually amazed that he reached the age of 75! I didn't know people could become that old back in those days. Was he an exception?

I don't think so - there is a widespread confusion about life expectancy. If, for example, child mortality was high compared to modern times, the life expectancy at birth was low.

However, for those who survived childhood, the life expectancy would not be very much different from modern.

Example: triplets were born, but one died at birth, another when he was 10, and another lived to 80. So, life expectancy at birth is only 30 years, but measured at five years of age it is 45 years, and measured at 20 years of age it is full 80 years.

This short article gives some explanation. http://www.livescience.com/10569-human-lifespans-constant-2-...

Re: Mathematicians who died under unfortunate or unfitting circumstances

#37
post #36
post #34

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm actually amazed that he reached the age of 75! I didn't know people could become that old back in those days. Was he an exception?

I don't think so - there is a widespread confusion about life expectancy. If, for example, child mortality was high compared to modern times, the life expectancy at birth was low. However, for those who survived childhood, the life expectancy would not be very much different from modern. Example: triplets were born, but one died at birth, another when he was 10, and another lived to 80. So, life expectancy at birth i…

75 would have been somewhat unusual in the US in 1900:

http://www.ssa.gov/oact/NOTES/as120/LifeTables_Tbl_10.html#w...

It shows the age 30 life expectancy, in 1900 it was 35 years, so 65 year old. Compare to today which is 47 years (77 years old).

There are life tables for historical periods, but the modern data is likely more reliable and still shows quite some difference.

Your link makes a good point about life expectancy at birth not being the right measure, but there is a very real expansion in life expectancy that has taken place. I guess infectious disease control probably pulled a lot of that expansion into the last 100 years.

Post reply on HN