Java Makes Programmers Want to Do Absolutely Anything Else with Their Time
1–10 of 18 posts
Re: Java Makes Programmers Want to Do Absolutely Anything Else with Their Time
#2Re: Java Makes Programmers Want to Do Absolutely Anything Else with Their Time
#3Oh please. It has displaced C and C++ for the vast majority of programming. And call me when people other than a few rabid fans and academics are actually using Haskell and OCaml for real software development.
Re: Java Makes Programmers Want to Do Absolutely Anything Else with Their Time
#4> it still isn’t competitive with C or C++ and, with a little love, Haskell and OCaml can or will eclipse it in that domain Oh please. It has displaced C and C++ for the vast majority of programming. And call me when people other than a few rabid fans and academics are actually using Haskell and OCaml for real software development.
> While it performs pretty well nowadays, it still isn’t competitive with C or C++ and, with a little love, Haskell and OCaml can or will eclipse it in that domain.
But don't underestimate C and C++. They're still widely used; by some measures, moreso than Java.
Re: Java Makes Programmers Want to Do Absolutely Anything Else with Their Time
#5> it still isn’t competitive with C or C++ and, with a little love, Haskell and OCaml can or will eclipse it in that domain Oh please. It has displaced C and C++ for the vast majority of programming. And call me when people other than a few rabid fans and academics are actually using Haskell and OCaml for real software development.
I think that quote was about performance. Full context: > While it performs pretty well nowadays, it still isn’t competitive with C or C++ and, with a little love, Haskell and OCaml can or will eclipse it in that domain. But don't underestimate C and C++. They're still widely used; by some measures, moreso than Java.
Re: Java Makes Programmers Want to Do Absolutely Anything Else with Their Time
#6> it still isn’t competitive with C or C++ and, with a little love, Haskell and OCaml can or will eclipse it in that domain Oh please. It has displaced C and C++ for the vast majority of programming. And call me when people other than a few rabid fans and academics are actually using Haskell and OCaml for real software development.
I think that quote was about performance. Full context: > While it performs pretty well nowadays, it still isn’t competitive with C or C++ and, with a little love, Haskell and OCaml can or will eclipse it in that domain. But don't underestimate C and C++. They're still widely used; by some measures, moreso than Java.
Re: Java Makes Programmers Want to Do Absolutely Anything Else with Their Time
#7I know which I find wayyyy less painful.
Re: Java Makes Programmers Want to Do Absolutely Anything Else with Their Time
#8Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think that quote was about performance. Full context: > While it performs pretty well nowadays, it still isn’t competitive with C or C++ and, with a little love, Haskell and OCaml can or will eclipse it in that domain. But don't underestimate C and C++. They're still widely used; by some measures, moreso than Java.
Programs written in C and C++ are certainly much, much, much more widely used than programs written in Java.
Re: Java Makes Programmers Want to Do Absolutely Anything Else with Their Time
#9> it still isn’t competitive with C or C++ and, with a little love, Haskell and OCaml can or will eclipse it in that domain Oh please. It has displaced C and C++ for the vast majority of programming. And call me when people other than a few rabid fans and academics are actually using Haskell and OCaml for real software development.
I think that quote was about performance. Full context: > While it performs pretty well nowadays, it still isn’t competitive with C or C++ and, with a little love, Haskell and OCaml can or will eclipse it in that domain. But don't underestimate C and C++. They're still widely used; by some measures, moreso than Java.
However, my company has a risk management system that was written in C++. It's a system of large matrix operations that uses a lot of CPU and memory. Being one of the few neck beards at my company who had ever written C++, I was tasked with translating it to java. In order to guarantee correctness, I slavishly maintained the algorithms, classes, etc. This allowed me to compare intermediate results at each step, but obviously didn't allow for any improvements I might otherwise have done. I was hoping for a runtime differential of 2x over the C++ version which would have been adequate for our needs. I paid no attention to runtime performance, though, since correctness was the prime goal - we're talking about real money in the balance. Once I was satisfied with the numbers, I ran some performance tests. I was shocked to find the jave version ran 40% faster than the C++ version. And this was prior to performance enhancements that I was able to put into the java version added largely by the huge ecosystem that has built up around java/JVM programming.
So, yes, I don't like java, but it's hard not to respect it. Obviously, one example doesn't end the debate about performance, but I'll admit to having been shocked at this result.
Re: Java Makes Programmers Want to Do Absolutely Anything Else with Their Time
#10http://www.quora.com/Why-do-many-software-engineers-not-like...
It contains four pages from two contributors, the first from our own michaelochurch. So the functional bent and OO bashing is no surprise.