Live data from Hacker News

Why the British Are Better at Satire

theatlantic.com

91–100 of 115 posts

Re: Why the British Are Better at Satire

#91
post #55
post #54

Earlier quoted context omitted.

While there maybe some truth to that, it's also worth noting that we see the same with all our (British) terrestrial TV networks. Particularly channel 4, which has given us classics such as The IT Crowd, Father Ted, The Inbetweeners and Black Books. Edit: and Brass Eye. How could I forgot Brass Eye when this topic is specifically about satire? Awesome show.

Let's regress this a level further - creating lots of small shows with potentially longer runs could result in a better talent pool (both actors/directors/producers), benefiting even private networks. How often do BBC actors work with other networks? If there's any cross-pollination there is an argument that the BBC's reach goes beyond it's own productions.

Do not overlook the feeder stream here: alternative standup comedy in the small-club format, and the giant mixing pot of the Edinburgh Festival Fringe. There's a definite progression of free fringe show -> paid fringe show -> getting talent spotted and onto TV.

Since partial privatisation much of the BBC's output is actually commissioned through a maze of independents. It's not like the old days when Morcambe and Wise being poached to ITV was a national crisis.

Re: Why the British Are Better at Satire

#92
post #46

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"But I think in the end, American audiences want to see the good in people, especially the main characters." I used to work in TV series development. One of the ongoing legends in the TV development business is how every American TV exec loves Fawlty Towers , and even though everyone's tried to adapt it for American TV, none of their attempts has been successful. The reason being that American audiences need the prot…

Is that really true? See, for instance, House: MD.

of course, House is played by an Englishman.

Re: Why the British Are Better at Satire

#93

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In America sarcasm in speech is usually heavily signaled via the tone of voice. You don't usually just drop it in deadpan. So it's not so much that we don't get sarcasm or satire but we're used to having it more clearly demarcated. At least in speech - satire is quite popular and common in print.

What you describe is arguably a symptom of people not getting sarcasm. People that enjoy sarcasm have learned the hard lesson that the average listener is oblivious to it, so they talk funny to help them out a little bit.

That might have been the genesis, but it's now continuing on its own.

Re: Why the British Are Better at Satire

#94
post #65

It's not just satire: Irony, sarcasm, comedy above the level of a 5 year old (i.e. where there's more than just a setup immediately followed by a predictable punchline: "Don't open the box Tommy!" Tommy opens the box, etc.). Classic quote: Speaking to an American about not having ridden a motorbike in years, my brother said "I'm sure it'll come back to me - it'll just be like riding a bike". The girl replied in all s…

As someone who is neither America nor British, I much prefer British humour as well.

Re: Why the British Are Better at Satire

#95
post #72

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think you've got it the wrong way round, actually. British shows typically run for a 6 episode series and then might go several years before a new series is produced. The Thick Of It has had 24 episodes since its inception in 2005, whereas its US adaption has already had 28 since 2012. Armando Ianucci (the writer) has straight up stated that he won't write any more The Thick Of It until he feels he has material wor…

What's more, the British seem to have no qualms about simply ending a series when they think there's nothing more to add. Consider Spaced: the cast and the audience loved it, but the story had come to a conclusion after the second series and the circumstances that originally gave birth to the ideas had changed, so they refused to consider another series. Contrast this with American shows which typically only end if t…

There are plenty of American shows that should have been cancelled after a single season, but weren't because they were popular.

Stuff like Prison Break, Heroes. In fact Prison Break's season 1 had a very clear, obvious conclusion (they broke out) - so there was no clear path for the story to take after that. In Britain it would not have been picked up for a second series.

Re: Why the British Are Better at Satire

#97

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What you describe is arguably a symptom of people not getting sarcasm. People that enjoy sarcasm have learned the hard lesson that the average listener is oblivious to it, so they talk funny to help them out a little bit.

That might have been the genesis, but it's now continuing on its own.

I'm sort of implicitly arguing there that talking funny isn't sarcasm anymore. Much of the fun of sarcasm is in the subtlety.

Re: Why the British Are Better at Satire

#98

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That might have been the genesis, but it's now continuing on its own.

I'm sort of implicitly arguing there that talking funny isn't sarcasm anymore. Much of the fun of sarcasm is in the subtlety.

It's certainly not the same thing, and I prefer the subtle stuff myself, but both types are sarcasm.

Re: Why the British Are Better at Satire

#99
post #65

It's not just satire: Irony, sarcasm, comedy above the level of a 5 year old (i.e. where there's more than just a setup immediately followed by a predictable punchline: "Don't open the box Tommy!" Tommy opens the box, etc.). Classic quote: Speaking to an American about not having ridden a motorbike in years, my brother said "I'm sure it'll come back to me - it'll just be like riding a bike". The girl replied in all s…

"We aren't as good at being loud though" In what context? I can think of a few situations where the British are world leaders in being loud and obnoxious - one of our main summer exports I'd have thought?

Ah yes! I'm so unconsciously middle class I forgot about the Magaluf crowds, etc.

Re: Why the British Are Better at Satire

#100
post #27

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've read somewhere that there's no real appreciation and respect between two men unless they make fun of each other.

You are worse than a youtube commenter. Edit: down voted... I guess some didn't get the joke

Nah it just didn't work for what you were aiming at, going about insulting random people is just that. People reading have no idea if you guys are buds or not so it registers as a legit complaint about the parent's comment quality.

Are you American by chance?

Post reply on HN