Live data from Hacker News

A female computer science major at Stanford: “Floored” by the sexism

fortune.com

31–40 of 174 posts

Re: A female computer science major at Stanford: “Floored” by the sexism

#31

Did she really use the word 'sausagefest'? Ouch. That noise was credibility slamming the door on the way out.

That's an uncharitable thing to say. Dismissing someone's entire argument because of a single word rather than considering the point at hand not only misses the forest for the trees, but also fails a pretty basic test of being a reasonable person:

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Tone_argument

Re: A female computer science major at Stanford: “Floored” by the sexism

#32

Most of these incidents just sound like guys who were genuinely trying to be nice or funny, but because anything can be seen through the lens of sexism, this woman took the opportunity to consider herself oppressed.

Hopefully you can understand that intent isn't everything? Being considerate of others isn't just saying "pshht i didn't mean anything by it!" it's actually thinking about how other people might react in the circumstances they've been put in. You can call sexism a lens, but it might also help to understand the experiences others have lived (from their POV, not yours) to see why it's a lens that others are brought to…

Perhaps, but there certainly are some incidents which are ambiguous. I fear that by taking that mindset we will create an environment where people have more incentive to not speak to or interact with women because they might get in trouble for an action that was either careless or consciously intended not to be sexist but gets twisted around and made to look that way. I certainly think that saying something like "you are less capable because you are a woman" is sexist but saying something like "your dress is fun" does not unambiguously imply that it was a sexual advance. Why can't it just be a nice unthreatening comment?

Re: A female computer science major at Stanford: “Floored” by the sexism

#33

Did she really use the word 'sausagefest'? Ouch. That noise was credibility slamming the door on the way out.

And your credibility is tied to your first and only comment on HN complaining about the use of sausagefest in an otherwise salient article.

Re: A female computer science major at Stanford: “Floored” by the sexism

#34

Most of these incidents just sound like guys who were genuinely trying to be nice or funny, but because anything can be seen through the lens of sexism, this woman took the opportunity to consider herself oppressed.

Hopefully you can understand that intent isn't everything? Being considerate of others isn't just saying "pshht i didn't mean anything by it!" it's actually thinking about how other people might react in the circumstances they've been put in. You can call sexism a lens, but it might also help to understand the experiences others have lived (from their POV, not yours) to see why it's a lens that others are brought to…

But everyone is subject to that. Humans are incredibly imperfect social beings - and teenagers and young adults are particularly good at not thinking through what they say. It doesn't mean people are trying to be sexist.

Re: A female computer science major at Stanford: “Floored” by the sexism

#35

Yup, sounds like standard fare. I would have been impressed if she'd documented and reported this shitty behaviour. Then again Confrontation is difficult, no matter the context.

When the guy said:

> Oh… well then I should have applied for that internship.

A simple response like "what do you mean?" would be completely appropriate. Given the context of this example, I have a difficult time accepting the male was implying anything like what the author felt was directed at her. Rather I think it's a more reasonable assumption he came to the conclusion that if so many people from his school got Facebook internships, then he should have applied as well. But, we'll never know unless people do ask for a deeper explanation instead of just assuming malice.

Re: A female computer science major at Stanford: “Floored” by the sexism

#36
post #12

Well she writes like a junior because she is. But the main points she makes - subtle sexism regarding capability in the face of equivalent effort - are certainly observable and do ring true. When I see articles like this (and the issue of sexism in computing does pop up quite often) I usually agree. It is there. But what can be done? I myself have been a disgusting example of a male engineer at times. And as much as…

You've successfully completed steps 1 and 2:

1. Acknowledge there is a real problem.

2. Acknowledge you are part of the problem.

Now, on to steps 3-n!

3. Don't be discouraged, accept that there are things you can do to help! This is good, you're about to become a more valuable member of society.

4. Accept that you need to put in some effort. Not much, don't worry. Most of it is shutting up.

5. Read what women write about this problem. They're all experts because they've been studying it literally their entire lives.

6. Learn (from step 5 and some self-reflection) how to recognize in real time when you're being a jerk. Then stop.

Now it gets a little harder. But remember, not nearly as hard as being a woman in tech, so buck up, kid!

7. Learn (from step 5) how to recognize in real time when other people are being jerks, and good techniques for how to advocate on behalf of women. This takes practice and courage, keep at it.

8. You'll be tempted to brag about how helpful you are to women (hi @wadhwa). Resist this temptation. Whenever you feel yourself about to tell someone how great and helpful you are, instead, show them something an actual woman has said about their problems, and try to point them in the right direction.

Note that you can replace "woman/women" in the above with any minority/disenfranchised/disadvantaged group you want to help, and the same formula pretty much works verbatim.

Re: A female computer science major at Stanford: “Floored” by the sexism

#38
post #24
post #12

Well she writes like a junior because she is. But the main points she makes - subtle sexism regarding capability in the face of equivalent effort - are certainly observable and do ring true. When I see articles like this (and the issue of sexism in computing does pop up quite often) I usually agree. It is there. But what can be done? I myself have been a disgusting example of a male engineer at times. And as much as…

[deleted]

Well, as an example, when I'm working in a mixed team of say 2 women and 5 men, and we're in a meeting discussing technical options, I may tend to give the women more eye contact than the men. This can go two ways for the women; it can be considered leering (I try very hard not to do that, but it is very difficult) and so that is an example of harassment. But in a way I am also giving away power to the women; power that they did nothing to earn other than be pretty.

One option is to stay heads down and surf ycombinator during a meeting. That way I'll not look at anyone inappropriately. That is not great for me though.

Re: A female computer science major at Stanford: “Floored” by the sexism

#39
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What is the message?

The message is that sexism and harrasment are still pervasive in tech. Not an original statement, but still needs to be said, over and over again, until things change.

Going on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on about sexism in tech is perhaps one of the best ways I can think of to make sure it doesn't change. It paints the picture that tech is a horrible place, so women should stay away. It tells people in tech that it's OK to be sexist, because everyone already is.

Re: A female computer science major at Stanford: “Floored” by the sexism

#40
post #30
post #22

First of all, calling a group of guys a sausage fest is reverse sexism. If I called a classroom full of girls a barbie play-date, or a tea party, or a "fashion" class - regardless of the real reason for their gathering, people would be outraged - and rightfully so. None of those things are true and it's disrespectful to say something like that. Second, the guy who said "well I should have applied for that" might have…

I generally agree with what you're saying, but what's the point of having a category called "reverse sexism"? Why not just stick with "sexism" and "not sexism"?

Simply a choice of words to contrast the article. I get what you're saying. It's sexism in both directions.
Post reply on HN