Show HN: Littlebox, a pure CSS icon library – worth continuing?
61–70 of 71 posts
Re: Show HN: Littlebox, a pure CSS icon library – worth continuing?
#62Re: Show HN: Littlebox, a pure CSS icon library – worth continuing?
#63Tested your page on an i3, all 4 cores are at 60%+ that's not very good... probably affects only the animated ones still
Maybe the animated ones should be left as images so far, otherwise great work with the static icons ++
Re: Show HN: Littlebox, a pure CSS icon library – worth continuing?
#64Tested your page on an i3, all 4 cores are at 60%+ that's not very good... probably affects only the animated ones still
That doesn't sound right. My 2520M stays at about 8%, using Firefox. That's still relatively high, but in reality there would only be a few on the screen at once.
One does not simply browse only one page at a time anymore
Re: Show HN: Littlebox, a pure CSS icon library – worth continuing?
#65Re: Show HN: Littlebox, a pure CSS icon library – worth continuing?
#66Re: Show HN: Littlebox, a pure CSS icon library – worth continuing?
#67Re: Show HN: Littlebox, a pure CSS icon library – worth continuing?
#68Re: Show HN: Littlebox, a pure CSS icon library – worth continuing?
#69Earlier quoted context omitted.
Don't forget about compatibility. You can be reasonably sure that font icons will display the same everywhere. CSS-based icons are all over the map compatibility-wise (display issues across browsers).
Sure, but font icons can only be one color. Can you give an example of a compatibility issue?
Re: Show HN: Littlebox, a pure CSS icon library – worth continuing?
#70Nice. A comment on the flags: I find the green of Italy indistinguishable from the blue on other flags, maybe make it lighter or something? And France is inverted: it's blue, white, red and not the other way around.