Live data from Hacker News

How One Stupid Tweet Blew Up Justine Sacco’s Life

nytimes.com

401–410 of 596 posts

Re: How One Stupid Tweet Blew Up Justine Sacco’s Life

#401

As a german i have to ask: Why do people get fired over things like this? Are american worker employee protection laws so weak that there is no recourse whatsoever for them?

http://www.nrwinvest.com/Business_Guide_englisch/Employees_a...

Apparently, you can also be fired in Germany for "disturbance of the general working environment"

Re: How One Stupid Tweet Blew Up Justine Sacco’s Life

#402

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> The ex-Mozilla CEO knows this well. An online bullying campaign was launched against him and he was forced to quit. Hahahahahahaha no. Eich paid money to political campaigns to ensure that some of his own employees and fellow citizens would not have basic human rights. Then, he refused to apologize for it and dodged the question when asked if he would do it again. That's not "expressing an opinion," that's nearly s…

Just curious why this is getting downvoted. Are people actually buying the whole "Eich is a victim because as a white multimillionaire he lost his job because he cared deeply about taking away the rights of others"...?

Yes, people are downvoting because Eich is white. That's most certainly the reason. ;)

Re: How One Stupid Tweet Blew Up Justine Sacco’s Life

#403
post #78

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> As dislikable as the tweet's content is Did you read the article? By thinking for a few seconds, the point of the tweet is obviously not racist. Not a smart tweet, in retrospect, but. Here's her explanation from the article: > I thought there was no way that anyone could possibly think it was literal. (...) Living in America puts us in a bit of a bubble when it comes to what is going on in the third world. I was ma…

> Did you read the article? By thinking for a few seconds, the point of the tweet is obviously not racist. Honestly, does it even matter? Say it was a racist tweet, and she was a racist. Does that mean she deserved what happened to her? Definitely not.

It matters because making an offhand joke parodying a stupid person is something that we've all done. This example shows that if you make a little parody joke like that in the wrong medium, your life could permanently pivot 180 degrees for the worst.

Re: How One Stupid Tweet Blew Up Justine Sacco’s Life

#404

Earlier quoted context omitted.

At what point does a set of reproducing cells become an "offspring"? It's a hard question to answer and there's no bright line. I understand the opposition's argument, and I don't feel nearly as much animosity towards them. There is no legitimate argument against gay marriage.

I'm gay (& partnered, fwiw), and I'd have to agree that there certainly aren't any good arguments against gay marriage; at least, not any arguments we'd accept in a wealthy, industrialized, western society at the beginning of this millennium, but do keep in mind that the great, great majority of the world does not agree with that assessment. So, what makes an argument legitimate? In order for one to suggest that ther…

I don't know that we need to go that far. In the US we take the stance that people should be free to do what they want unless what they want to do interferes with other people doing what they want. Where people conflict in their desires is where the law comes in to settle the matter. Whether that system is good or not is an open question, I guess, but it's what we have.

Using that as a rulestick, no one will be negatively impacted by homosexuals getting married. Studies have been done, plenty of places around the globe have tried it with no negative consequences. The courts agree. There's no government interest in preventing gay marriage.

Re: How One Stupid Tweet Blew Up Justine Sacco’s Life

#405

I think that public shaming can be laid directly at the feet of Social Justice. It would be great if people who want to make things better for minorities chose a different tactic - private communication rather than public ostracism.

> I think that public shaming can be laid directly at the feet of Social Justice. I'm not entirely sure of what "Social Justice" means in the US, or how can such a thing be negative, but it seems to me that it's about enforcing social norms. If the social clock was set back a few decades earlier, you would get the same pitchfork mob if you tweeted something in favour of homosexuality. Just look at what happened to Ad…

> I'm not entirely sure of what "Social Justice" means in the US, or how can such a thing be negative

The phrase "social justice" in this context usually refers to things like this:

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=social+justic...

http://www.reddit.com/r/TumblrInAction/top/?sort=top&t=all

Re: How One Stupid Tweet Blew Up Justine Sacco’s Life

#406

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The gray text makes it look like a lot of people disagree. So suppose for the sake of argument that lots of people on the internet considered this post "really f*cking stupid" and tried to get you fired for it - would that not be a problem? I mean presumably you don't think it was a repugnant thing to have posted, but then neither did Justine Sacco.

A fair point but comparing the ideal that people should be held responsible for their actions to a bad racist joke intended to highlight that "living in America puts us in a bit of a bubble when it comes to what is going on in the third world" is apples and oranges at best. If you feel like Gawker would be interested in running a piece on my comment then feel free to go ahead and submit it.

These things are subjective. Presumably Sacco felt that comparing genuinely racist content to someone's sarcastic joke about themselves was apples and oranges as well. I rather do myself.

Put it this way - nobody is against the idea of "people being held responsible for their actions". But it's pretty hard to buy that that's what happened here. I remember when the Sacco thing was trending and I never saw anyone who seemed hurt or angry, or even offended. To the contrary, people were thrilled that some PR asshole was going to get fired but didn't know it yet.

Re: How One Stupid Tweet Blew Up Justine Sacco’s Life

#407
post #312

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Would society really be any better off if people aren't held accountable for what they say?

The coorect response to what most of these people said is for someone to pull them to one side and say "stop being a dick, especially if you're using the company social media account". Threats of violence, loss of job, weeks long campaigns -- none of that is an appropriate response.

in for example Eich's case how do you pull him aside and say "stop being a dick by donating to hate, and then trying to run a diverse company?"

Re: How One Stupid Tweet Blew Up Justine Sacco’s Life

#408
The only people that can get away with a tweet like that are stand up comedians. The tweet in the article sounds almost verbatim what a comedian like Amy Schumer would say on stage.I guess it is a reality of social media. I dont know that I have ever felt compelled to police social media. Sure it takes so little investment to involve yourself in some drama that in real life would require more work, and most peoples sense of shame prevents them from partaking in.

I almost wonder if the best way to handle a scenario like this is to go FULL TROLL MODE and up the ante. Blow out your own credibility so that people realize they are wasting their energy on nonsense.

Re: How One Stupid Tweet Blew Up Justine Sacco’s Life

#410

French guy here. This article only speak about employees in american company getting fired about some data shared on the web. But I would be curious to know what happened to people who faced the same situation working in continental european companies. It would be surprising if people would lost their jobs so easily. Either because I think it's culturally better accepted for private people (I mean not public figures)…

French guy here as well, and this was exactly my reaction. It seemed very exotic, this notion that an employer was allowed to fire you just because a bunch of people on the Internet have started disliking you in a vocal way because of something you said (as an individual, not reflecting your employer's opinion, not illegal).

This feels like the main issue here. Barring substantial improvements in everyone's maturity, you won't be able to prevent random people on the Internet from focusing on you for whatever reason. The actual individual actions that follow, however (the employer arbitrarily sacking you, people refusing you service, people harassing you, etc.) are what crosses the line, in my opinion.

Post reply on HN