Email Encryption Software Relies on One Guy, Who Is Going Broke
371–380 of 469 posts
Re: Email Encryption Software Relies on One Guy, Who Is Going Broke
#372Update, Feb. 5, 2015, 8:10 p.m.: After this article appeared, Werner Koch informed us that last week he was awarded a one-time grant of $60,000 from Linux Foundation's Core Infrastructure Initiative. Werner told us he only received permission to disclose it after our article published. Meanwhile, since our story was posted, donations flooded Werner's website donation page and he reached his funding goal of $137,000. In addition, Facebook and the online payment processor Stripe each pledged to donate $50,000 a year to Koch’s project.
Re: Email Encryption Software Relies on One Guy, Who Is Going Broke
#373Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'll check that out. Thank you!
By all means. Ed25519 (which underlies signify) is a pretty decent modern signature scheme. (tweetnacl.c also implements it, in less code.) It also seems you want to expire things, so I do feel I have to warn you that signatures are a totally separate thing to a secure time source, which is a whole different bag of marbles. However, since what you're designing sounds like a logic bomb/copy protection/DRM system, I mu…
Re: Email Encryption Software Relies on One Guy, Who Is Going Broke
#374The problem, in other words, was that lots of people like me, who depend everyday on gpg and are thankful for it, would have supported it over all these years if only we had known that its maintainer was barely scraping by on $25K a year.
Kudos to Pro Publica for bringing this to everyone's attention.
Re: Email Encryption Software Relies on One Guy, Who Is Going Broke
#375Earlier quoted context omitted.
The people who would buy computers with Linux probably wouldn't pay for tech support. Enterprises might, but not individuals. Plus I suspect that Microsoft is pretty keen to defend Windows on the consumer front - I've heard stories of deep OEM discounts on the condition that they don't offer alternative OSes.
I mean in the same way you buy a Dell notebook and get two years of phone support, you would get the same with a Dell Ubuntu notebook but Canonical would provide it and Dell would pay them for it.
Re: Email Encryption Software Relies on One Guy, Who Is Going Broke
#376Let's send him some money directly: https://www.tilt.com/campaigns/werner-koch-deserves-to-get-p...
Why is that better than the GnuPG donate page: https://www.gnupg.org/donate/index.html ?
Looks like this is working, the number is way up. A little advertising goes a long way.
Re: Email Encryption Software Relies on One Guy, Who Is Going Broke
#377Apparently Stripe and Facebook just stepped in to pledge $50K/year each. https://twitter.com/stripe/status/563449352635432960
Re: Email Encryption Software Relies on One Guy, Who Is Going Broke
#378Re: Email Encryption Software Relies on One Guy, Who Is Going Broke
#379Apparently Stripe and Facebook just stepped in to pledge $50K/year each. https://twitter.com/stripe/status/563449352635432960
That's awesome, but it's weird to me that Facebook, etc. will happily pay a senior engineer a total compensation of $200k+ yet only pledge $50k for the maintainer of a critical tool. Not trying to look a gift horse in the mouth here, just odd perception of the priorities here.
Re: Email Encryption Software Relies on One Guy, Who Is Going Broke
#380There does seem to be a need for an "Internet fund". Pick 100 of the core free technologies that everyone relies on and pay people to maintain them.
I'm really dismayed that the Core Infrastructure Initiative, which was created in the aftermath of Heartbleed to fund OpenSSL and other critical software, has chosen to prioritize NTP , and not GnuPG[1]. Most of the companies that rely on OpenSSL are probably using a distro that uses GPG to securely distribute the OpenSSL package. [1] http://www.linuxfoundation.org/programs/core-infrastructure-...