The text-to-speech is actually a little nicer than Siri or Cortana, but not groundbreaking. This was the only one of the 5 that I thought did well. The rest might have been better without demo pages. For visual recognition, I used a picture of a snowmobile from http://www.1888goodwin.com/2013/11/14/what-do-you-need-to-do... , which it identified with 73% confidence as "Invertebrate". Speech to text is a parody twitte…
New services expand IBM Watson capabilities to images, speech, and more
21–30 of 110 posts
Re: New services expand IBM Watson capabilities to images, speech, and more
#221. No "special characters" allowed in passwords when creating an account. 2. ...where's the REST API? I've "added a service" (TTS), but I have to write a webapp to expose it over HTTP? It sure is a different experience than your typical API documentation.
Re: New services expand IBM Watson capabilities to images, speech, and more
#23Some context on the new services. They are built on technology that comes from IBM Research and has been moved into the Watson group in 2014. Some like speech, have been developed for more than 50 years. None of these technologies have overlap with the Watson Jeopardy stack (except for the Watson voice). We will release that stack later this year as a series of services allowing you to build a full Q&A/dialog applica…
> If you have any questions, please fire up, the Watson team is ready to answer.
So that's what you built Watson for :-)
Re: New services expand IBM Watson capabilities to images, speech, and more
#24Re: New services expand IBM Watson capabilities to images, speech, and more
#25Compare the Watson text-to-speech voices with Nuance ... Watson http://text-to-speech-demo.mybluemix.net/ Nuance http://www.nuance.com/for-business/text-to-speech/vocalizer/... I prefer the Watson version voicing a sample paragraph. Both are good enough for an application that selects on price. For a voice-first application, maybe Watson is better for TTS. For speech to text, Nuance has been the leader, e.g. Apple's…
Re: New services expand IBM Watson capabilities to images, speech, and more
#26Re: New services expand IBM Watson capabilities to images, speech, and more
#27Some context on the new services. They are built on technology that comes from IBM Research and has been moved into the Watson group in 2014. Some like speech, have been developed for more than 50 years. None of these technologies have overlap with the Watson Jeopardy stack (except for the Watson voice). We will release that stack later this year as a series of services allowing you to build a full Q&A/dialog applica…
> allowing you to build a full Q&A/dialog application. > If you have any questions, please fire up, the Watson team is ready to answer. So that's what you built Watson for :-)
Re: New services expand IBM Watson capabilities to images, speech, and more
#28Compare the Watson text-to-speech voices with Nuance ... Watson http://text-to-speech-demo.mybluemix.net/ Nuance http://www.nuance.com/for-business/text-to-speech/vocalizer/... I prefer the Watson version voicing a sample paragraph. Both are good enough for an application that selects on price. For a voice-first application, maybe Watson is better for TTS. For speech to text, Nuance has been the leader, e.g. Apple's…
My evidence is anecdotal at best, but I have found Siri to be terrible and my "OK, Google" to be wonderful.
Re: New services expand IBM Watson capabilities to images, speech, and more
#29Re: New services expand IBM Watson capabilities to images, speech, and more
#30Visual recognition has some room for improvement http://i.imgur.com/V59IeQH.png