Fake?
freepatentsonline.com
Fake?
1–4 of 4 posts
Re: Fake?
#2Isn't that already done via modulation?
Re: Fake?
#3Nonsense that won't work and was written by someone with no understanding of how wireless data modulation schemes actually encode.
Re: Fake?
#4"Fake?" is not a very descriptive title. From the guidelines:
> Otherwise please use the original title, unless it is misleading or linkbait.
I think this is not "fake", only "wrong" and very "misguided".
It's a common mistake to mix some anagogic parts and forget to use the counting argument to "invent" a new compression scheme. The problem is that all the legalese and the lack of a working prototype (or at least something remotely similar to a blueprint of an implementation) doesn't make obvious that this won't work.