The problem for Microsoft isn't that they didn't see mobile coming and Apple did like as article suggests. The problem for Microsoft is that their previous strategy of ruthlessly copying Apple's innovations and taking the market for themselves with a highly profitable licensing model was coopted by Google doing the same thing except Google gave it away. If you're looking for the old MS it's alive and well at Google,…
Well MS lost mobile because quite frankly they didn't control the hardware, and for a time it seemed OK to simply provide software for them, but they couldn't push a specific idea out the door until it was too late. They were happy to provide an OS that did phone calls, text messages, emails and a few other small things. They didn't quite see the big picture, it's not that they didn't see it coming (they were already…
How, and Why, Apple Overtook Microsoft
21–30 of 57 posts
Re: How, and Why, Apple Overtook Microsoft
#22Is interesting but now Microsoft is the more open company and Apple is IBM from the 1984 commercial. Maybe I'm just older, but now at 30 I'm much more of into Microsoft than when I was a teenager(I never really got on the hate M$ bandwagon though). What they have been doing with Azure and .NET ecosystems is great. They have top engineering and research chops; just look at the new goggles and a lot of their labs proje…
Re: How, and Why, Apple Overtook Microsoft
#23So yes, Apple's iPhone is like Microsoft's Windows. Both are hugely successful products that accounted for the bulk of their creator's profits. Microsoft was unwilling to threaten the enormous revenue it gets from Windows, and now that the focus of innovation has shifted away from PCs it has lost its dominance.
Will Apple make the same mistake? No. Its first attempt to one-up the iPhone was the iPad. For a while, it looked like it might succeed: iPad sales took off even faster than iPhone sales had. But then they plateaued, while the iPhone kept growing. Nice try, but no dice. The iPad is nice little business, but it won't eclipse the iPhone.
Next try: the Apple Watch. It's not out yet, so we don't know what will happen. But it's clear that this is Apple's next big move. This is not a hobby. They'll be putting all their weight behind the product line. It might flop or it might be another (multi-billion dollar) side business that lags behind the wild profitability of the iPhone.
Mr. Stewart ends with a quote from analyst Robert Cihra: “The question investors have is, what’s the next iPhone? There’s no obvious answer. It’s almost impossible to think of anything that will create a $140 billion business out of nothing.”
Well, maybe investors can't think of anything, but it's clear that Apple thinks the next iPhone will be wearables. And they sure as hell aren't killing promising products for fear of cannibalizing iPhone sales.
Re: How, and Why, Apple Overtook Microsoft
#24Is interesting but now Microsoft is the more open company and Apple is IBM from the 1984 commercial. Maybe I'm just older, but now at 30 I'm much more of into Microsoft than when I was a teenager(I never really got on the hate M$ bandwagon though). What they have been doing with Azure and .NET ecosystems is great. They have top engineering and research chops; just look at the new goggles and a lot of their labs proje…
Btw, Apple has never been open source. And they only have 5% desktop market share worldwide. Pretend that mobile doesn't exist. The "PC" world hasn't changed much in 20 years. Mac is more accepted but they're just a rounding error compared to Windows.
Finally, iPhone is Apple's big money maker. However, they have less than 20% market share in the global market. They're doing pretty well in some markets, but Android is the dominant mobile OS.
Re: How, and Why, Apple Overtook Microsoft
#25The easiest explanation of what happened was Microsoft were a software company who had all of their eggs in one basket relying upon third parties to use their operating system and consumers/enterprise to use their products like Microsoft Office. Whereas Apple started out as both a hardware and software company, first computers and then portable music players (iPod), watches (iWatch) and phones (iPhone). This is where…
Lockout is one way of looking at it. Another way is that it gives them the ability to make things integrate extremely well. Seamless integration like Apple does is extremely difficult to achieve without complete control of the ecosystem.
> Not to mention, they were focusing on the design aspect of the devices themselves which others were not.
This is where Microsoft still falls hopelessly short. They make ugly, geeky looking hardware. Everything Apple makes looks and feels beautiful.
> It seems the iPhone is their meal ticket, if the iPhone eventually fizzles out, where will that leave Apple
I'm not sure which other phone I could buy that would integrate with the rest of the Apple ecosystem? Unless they lag really badly in whatever technical advances mobile phones make, this doesn't seem likely. Some people like myself don't keep buying iPhones because of its technical specifications.
Re: How, and Why, Apple Overtook Microsoft
#26Is interesting but now Microsoft is the more open company and Apple is IBM from the 1984 commercial. Maybe I'm just older, but now at 30 I'm much more of into Microsoft than when I was a teenager(I never really got on the hate M$ bandwagon though). What they have been doing with Azure and .NET ecosystems is great. They have top engineering and research chops; just look at the new goggles and a lot of their labs proje…
Funny, I can't seem to find Microsoft's file formats for Excel and Word published anywhere. Microsoft is open source where it doesn't really matter, as far as the market is concerned. Btw, Apple has never been open source. And they only have 5% desktop market share worldwide. Pretend that mobile doesn't exist. The "PC" world hasn't changed much in 20 years. Mac is more accepted but they're just a rounding error compa…
Re: How, and Why, Apple Overtook Microsoft
#27The problem for Microsoft isn't that they didn't see mobile coming and Apple did like as article suggests. The problem for Microsoft is that their previous strategy of ruthlessly copying Apple's innovations and taking the market for themselves with a highly profitable licensing model was coopted by Google doing the same thing except Google gave it away. If you're looking for the old MS it's alive and well at Google,…
IMO, Microsoft (and other handset makers) focused a lot of their energy on the enterprise market. Looking at screenshots of early handhelds show productivity as one of the "bullet points on the box."
Apple had the luxury of approaching the phone market from the other direction. They've spent several years making the iPod, that a consumer-oriented phone was a natural evolution of that. They also knew how to sell it.
Re: How, and Why, Apple Overtook Microsoft
#28"There is a clear goal and it isn't to make money. The goal is to desperately try to make the best products we can. We are not naive - if you trust it, people like it, they buy it and we make money. This is a consequence."
"We won't be different for different's sake. Different is easy... make it pink and fluffy! Better is harder. Making something different often has a marketing and corporate agenda."
Over a long time focus on the best products and user experience can be powerful. Meanwhile Microsoft were doing things like killing the start menu which not many users were keen on.
Re: How, and Why, Apple Overtook Microsoft
#29Is interesting but now Microsoft is the more open company and Apple is IBM from the 1984 commercial. Maybe I'm just older, but now at 30 I'm much more of into Microsoft than when I was a teenager(I never really got on the hate M$ bandwagon though). What they have been doing with Azure and .NET ecosystems is great. They have top engineering and research chops; just look at the new goggles and a lot of their labs proje…
I think Apple offers a big walled garden for computing.
Re: How, and Why, Apple Overtook Microsoft
#30Is interesting but now Microsoft is the more open company and Apple is IBM from the 1984 commercial. Maybe I'm just older, but now at 30 I'm much more of into Microsoft than when I was a teenager(I never really got on the hate M$ bandwagon though). What they have been doing with Azure and .NET ecosystems is great. They have top engineering and research chops; just look at the new goggles and a lot of their labs proje…