This set me up for a negative article about Go, but, like other Go-related materials, it makes me want to use it. I should use it.
From Node.js to Go
11–20 of 192 posts
Re: From Node.js to Go
#12How is this a true statement? Ease of distribution isn't a function of a language's runtime environment (native vs interpreter).
Re: From Node.js to Go
#13Go is definitely promising but the last time I checked the problem with web development with Go was that there is no mature libraries for User authentication etc(Please correct me if I'm wrong). This makes going with Node or something like Rails more tempting.
Checkout Negroni [1] for middleware configuration combined with restgate [2] [1] https://github.com/codegangsta/negroni [2] https://github.com/pjebs/restgate
Re: From Node.js to Go
#14> Go is a compiled language so distributing applications for use on multiple platforms is just easier. How is this a true statement? Ease of distribution isn't a function of a language's runtime environment (native vs interpreter).
Re: From Node.js to Go
#15> Go is a compiled language so distributing applications for use on multiple platforms is just easier. How is this a true statement? Ease of distribution isn't a function of a language's runtime environment (native vs interpreter).
Re: From Node.js to Go
#16Re: From Node.js to Go
#17For me the single biggest disadvantage of Go against Node.JS is the lack of a decent dependency management solution. NPM is awesome and Go doesn't even have a "meh" answer to that.
Re: From Node.js to Go
#18For me the single biggest disadvantage of Go against Node.JS is the lack of a decent dependency management solution. NPM is awesome and Go doesn't even have a "meh" answer to that.
Re: From Node.js to Go
#19I wish a language with advanced types like Haskell or OCaml would have the same tooling and ease of distribution around it that Go does. I haven't built anything in Haskell/ML in a while, so if anyone has any updates on this please chime in.
Re: From Node.js to Go
#20I wish a language with advanced types like Haskell or OCaml would have the same tooling and ease of distribution around it that Go does. I haven't built anything in Haskell/ML in a while, so if anyone has any updates on this please chime in.
Edit: mea culpa for my attempt at tongue-in-cheek humor, "I think that's called Rust - http://www.rust-lang.org/"