Live data from Hacker News

Netflix’s Secret Special Algorithm Is a Human

newyorker.com

61–62 of 62 posts

Re: Netflix’s Secret Special Algorithm Is a Human

#61
post #41

I also rather trust the algorithm to see what is a good movie and what is not. In my case the collected ratings of the experts, not the users. Current example: http://cannes-rurban.rhcloud.com/Sundance2015 There are some outliers, typical "festival hits", which only relate to festival specialists, but they are easily detectable, with a "10%" human bullshit detector. Like last years Godard at Cannes, 2012 Leos Carax,…

Rotten Tomatoes' rating, mentioned in the article as scoring THE BRONZE as 10% (though the RT now says 18%), is also a collection of professional reviewers' ratings.

Exactly. Almost everybody agrees that The Bronze is shit, you can trust the collected experts in big numbers. But you also need the standard deviation to filter "special audience" flicks, like festival masturbation, horror or erotic movies, which are targeted to a very narrow audience.

Re: Netflix’s Secret Special Algorithm Is a Human

#62
post #59

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Very interesting. Did he enjoy it or did he get bored? Did he have to watch some horrific films? Did he feel like his brain was being polluted as more degenerate films come out? Did it affect his perception of reality? Just interested.

Spare a thought for the people at the BBFC in the UK who in addition to having to watch every feature film to rate it also have to watch all the pornography videos to rate and check for legality. I attended a university debate once between a BBFC censor and a female porn director. Watching the two of them talking about "counting knuckles during a fisting scene" to check that the UK requirement that at least one knuck…

Have the BBFC ratings dropped though? I mean, stuff that was horrific and rated as 18 in the 1970s is now routinely part of films rated 12 or 12A. The sheer amount of violence that is part of films has significantly risen.
Post reply on HN