I wish they'd go into more detail on why they can't make an app like paper in the browser environment. They mentioned something about Web Workers being crippled and later on explained how their framework puts JavaScript in it's own thread by default. I'm also wondering why in their experience no one ever comes close to native widgets when imitating them in a Web apps.
Introducing React Native [video]
41–50 of 193 posts
Re: Introducing React Native [video]
#42Sorry, dumb question, don't feel like watching the video: What platforms are targetted? Out of, say, iOS, Android, Linux/X11 desktop, Windows desktop, WinRT, OSX?
This is Eric, from the React Native team. We're starting with iOS and Android, which will keep us busy for the foreseeable future. That said, we will open source soon, and we'd be happy to accept help targeting other platforms!
Re: Introducing React Native [video]
#43I can't wait to have access to this repo to see source code and examples.
Re: Introducing React Native [video]
#44Re: Introducing React Native [video]
#45I wish they'd go into more detail on why they can't make an app like paper in the browser environment. They mentioned something about Web Workers being crippled and later on explained how their framework puts JavaScript in it's own thread by default. I'm also wondering why in their experience no one ever comes close to native widgets when imitating them in a Web apps.
But it doesn't have a lot of gestures+animations+images, so that might be the difference.
Re: Introducing React Native [video]
#46It fails like many other framework tried to create native apps with JavaScript
Those mobile Javascript frameworks uses the DOM. React native won't.
Re: Introducing React Native [video]
#47That's it. I'm finally going to port GridBagLayout to Javascript.
This is a classic gridbag cartoon: http://madbean.com/anim/totallygridbag
Re: Introducing React Native [video]
#48And did even Steve Yegge ever see this next big language coming?
Re: Introducing React Native [video]
#49Earlier quoted context omitted.
Honest question: Would you even need something like react on windows given that wpf/winrt already support dependency properties and data binding?
React, as the developers argue, is a step beyond data binding. It emphasises immutability and a single data flow, rather than the combinatorial interdependency of the data binding approach.
What they've done with react native sounds a lot like how WPF works anyways (scene graph updated in UI thread, rendering thread then renders scene graph). Now, there is nothing wrong with that, I think its all good. But I don't think there is a good reason to use React in Windows project since most of the problems it solves have already been solved.
Re: Introducing React Native [video]
#50I wish they'd go into more detail on why they can't make an app like paper in the browser environment. They mentioned something about Web Workers being crippled and later on explained how their framework puts JavaScript in it's own thread by default. I'm also wondering why in their experience no one ever comes close to native widgets when imitating them in a Web apps.
with gpu-accelerated css transitions, requestAnimationFrame, virtual dom and web workers, the experience can be damn close. he makes it seem like "no comparison", this is provably false at least for the apps he demoed. for games, native is still necessary. what react offers beyond performance though, is definitely awesome. imo, the talk comes off a bit like a sales pitch at a pep rally.
It could be the case that the features you mentioned are suitable today for web applications targeting the latest iPhone on browsers on the latest standards, but not when React was first developed.