Live data from Hacker News

James Webb Space Telescope

jwst.nasa.gov

31–39 of 39 posts

Re: James Webb Space Telescope

#31

My group at Goddard has done work on the JWST detectors. JWST is a big deal here. It also scares the crap out of me, due to the gymnastics that are needed to get it unfolded properly, in a location where repair is impossible. A lot of people will be very, very happy when this thing is in orbit and working.

What kind of detectors are you working with? Are they of a different kind or just more powerful than what's already up there?

Re: James Webb Space Telescope

#32
I'm glad to see some folks on here involved with the JWST, thanks for all your efforts!

I have a question: is the big cost primarily due to the one-off nature of the components, figuring things out for the first time etc? I ask because there's some proposals (ExoEarth Mapper) for constructing a giant array of 20+ of JWST-like telescopes in order to get pictures of earth-like planets.

So if one JWST costs $8Billion, how much would 25 cost?

Re: James Webb Space Telescope

#33
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Until this post I didn't realize it wasn't going to orbit Earth in roughly the same spot as Hubble -- it's going to be roughly 4 times further away from Earth than the Moon is, orbiting L2! http://jwst.nasa.gov/orbit.html

I never understood how we can launch something into an L2 orbit. Does the rocket just fly out there and stop? Just it get caught at that location?

Check out https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newton%27s_cannonball and http://www.scilogs.eu/en/blog/go-for-launch/2009-05-28/how-t.... To fly to the L2 point, you have to get your rocket into (an elliptical) orbit around the Sun that intersects with the L2 point. Once you get to L2, you have to match its velocity, which you do by firing your engines to speed up (or slow down) such that your rocket and the L2 point have zero velocity relative to one another.

While Kerbal Space Program's physics simulation doesn't have Lagrange points, you can get a pretty good feel for how they work by performing any kind of in-orbit rendezvous.

Re: James Webb Space Telescope

#34
post #31

My group at Goddard has done work on the JWST detectors. JWST is a big deal here. It also scares the crap out of me, due to the gymnastics that are needed to get it unfolded properly, in a location where repair is impossible. A lot of people will be very, very happy when this thing is in orbit and working.

What kind of detectors are you working with? Are they of a different kind or just more powerful than what's already up there?

Sorry, I'm just the sysadmin here. A lot of the JWST work was done before I got here, but we still help support them. I'm sure there is detailed information on the web about the detectors in use on JWST.

Re: James Webb Space Telescope

#36
post #21
post #20

Remember who runs congress now, prepare for it be canceled (again).

I saw this in Wikipedia: "The JWST has a history of major cost overruns. In 2011, the United States House of Representatives voted to terminate funding, after about $3 billion had been spent and 75 percent of its hardware was in production. Funding was restored in compromise legislation with the US Senate, and spending on the program was capped at $8 billion. As of December 2014, the telescope remained on schedule an…

Some things ARE expensive because they are difficult, require quality components or processing. I would rather spend on difficult science than on dumb bombs...

Re: James Webb Space Telescope

#37

Hey, my job's on HN! I work on JWST (simulation software, among other stuff) and I think it's pretty cool too :)

Very cool. How much data is going to be arriving from JWST daily? Is it going to be readily open to the public?

> Is it going to be readily open to the public?

The scientific data will be available to the public, sometimes after a "proprietary" period (typically in the range 6–18 months) where the data is only accessible to the team who successfully proposed to obtain that data.

Re: James Webb Space Telescope

#38

Hey, my job's on HN! I work on JWST (simulation software, among other stuff) and I think it's pretty cool too :)

As an astronomer who works on infrared data every day, I am really grateful for everything you guys are doing. What kind of simulation software are you developing?

I'm working on WebbPSF, a tool to simulate PSFs for the Webb instruments. I'm also adapting it for WFIRST, a future mission. It's going to be kind of like TinyTim is for Hubble when it's done.

Re: James Webb Space Telescope

#39

Hey, my job's on HN! I work on JWST (simulation software, among other stuff) and I think it's pretty cool too :)

Very cool. How much data is going to be arriving from JWST daily? Is it going to be readily open to the public?

Not really my department! I do work at STScI, which operates the MAST archive that will eventually hold all this data, so I'm sure someone in my building knows.
Post reply on HN