Live data from Hacker News

“I paid $25 for an Invisible Boyfriend, and I think I might be in love”

washingtonpost.com

121–130 of 265 posts

Re: “I paid $25 for an Invisible Boyfriend, and I think I might be in love”

#121
post #104

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The really sad thing is that by using something (like this) to veil singleness, one cuts off any genuine interest from a genuine person. Few will initiate a date with someone texting their (unbenownst virtual) "significant other".

Thats really not how dating works, at all. Competition spurs attraction, not the other way around.

I think it actually depends upon the couple. People who care what other people think tend to date other people who care what other people think, while people who make up their own mind tend to date other people who make up their own mind. This trait seems to be more strongly assortative than pretty much anything else I've observed - intelligence, social class, beauty, etc.

So the grandparent's point is well-taken. You date folks for whom competition spurs attraction, because that's what you believe. Someone who doesn't isn't going to be attracted to someone who's always got a girl on his finger.

Re: “I paid $25 for an Invisible Boyfriend, and I think I might be in love”

#124
post #68

Basically virtual escorting as a service (not all escorting is sex, some of it is just companionship). For now there's no sex involved but with how easy it is to connect people nearby you could easily see this type of service expand in markets where it's legal. I could see nude selfies being sent too down the road (again a different service, not exactly this one).

> I could see nude selfies being sent too down the road (again a different service, not exactly this one).

That's called instagram.

Re: “I paid $25 for an Invisible Boyfriend, and I think I might be in love”

#125

For $25/month, I wonder how the economics of this work out. Say they pay $0.05/text (to the MTurker). In about 500 texts, the budget will be used up. That's about 15 texts/day; that's not a lot for today.

That plan included 100 texts per month (last paragraph of the article).

Re: “I paid $25 for an Invisible Boyfriend, and I think I might be in love”

#126
post #98

Earlier quoted context omitted.

She doesn't want the unattractive guys to hit on her, so she texts her fake significant other. The fantasy of an attractive guy being her boyfriend is better than a real boyfriend being just a regular guy.

Or maybe it's just a polite way of turning down a guy you're not interested in. Maybe having that instant out is more convenient than having to fight off advances for an hour.

What exactly is polite about lying? It seems like an easy way out instead of the right way out: just telling somebody you're not interested.

Re: “I paid $25 for an Invisible Boyfriend, and I think I might be in love”

#127
post #126

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Or maybe it's just a polite way of turning down a guy you're not interested in. Maybe having that instant out is more convenient than having to fight off advances for an hour.

What exactly is polite about lying? It seems like an easy way out instead of the right way out: just telling somebody you're not interested.

Some people don't take like to take no for an answer. Some people will continue to engage, despite a woman making it clear that they are not interested; some of those people, however, respect other men enough that they will disengage when they find out a woman is "taken".

And as for the politeness of lying, consider "white lies". Sometimes honesty, even non-brutal honesty, is not the polite option.

Re: “I paid $25 for an Invisible Boyfriend, and I think I might be in love”

#128

What happens when mum want's to meet him/her?

That's where my new service, visibleboyfriend.io, comes in. We lease premium models, in both male and female forms, to accompany you to business meetings, family dinners, government functions et cetera. Our models have all been vetted as being 'significantly more attractive than anyone you could probably hope to date' by an independent council of data scientists and casting agency magnates. We also train our models t…

Should have committed to the bit and registered that domain.

Re: “I paid $25 for an Invisible Boyfriend, and I think I might be in love”

#129
post #99

Earlier quoted context omitted.

For most people, looks ARE part of the equation. It's like removing Pi from an equation. I wonder what's going to happen when science makes looks whatever we want, like hair color.

> For most people, looks ARE part of the equation. It's like removing Pi from an equation. Did you read that OKCupid piece on when they turned off profile pictures for a day? Supposedly the result was better for their users - people who went on these "truly blind dates" had significantly better odds of a successful relationship coming out of it than the site average. Looks do matter, but the way we encounter each oth…

When I met my fiancee on OKCupid, she had really grainy profile pics. She'd initially refused to give me her number (she had trouble with stalkers in the past) and was like "Oh, you know what I look like, you can find me on the Caltrain platform." I was like, "No, actually I don't. Here's mine." I wouldn't have been able to find her just going off the profile pics.

That said, there's probably no market for a text-only dating service. The problem is that people who end up in successful relationships drop out of the dating pool entirely, and are no longer in the customer base. We shut down our OKCupid accounts a few weeks after meeting, for example. The online dating industry is really fueled by hookups; if it weren't for casual encounters, dating sites would have no repeat customers. Tinder is the one company that really gets this - they're like "Yeah, we won't even make a pretense about this being about personality, realistically you just want to have sex with somebody hot and then come back to the app tomorrow. If you end up in a relationship, well, good for you! (And not for us. :-/)"

Re: “I paid $25 for an Invisible Boyfriend, and I think I might be in love”

#130
post #44

Earlier quoted context omitted.

He meant genetic engineering of adults. Inheritable.

How would you genetically engineer an adult, or anyone who is born? It would require changing the DNA of all cells, as well as executing those changes.

And not having the immune system reject all the changes as soon as its own DNA starts changing.

It has the same problem as upgrading a distributed system that checksums all incoming protocols against its own binary. As soon as the binary changes, everything else gets rejected, and the system grinds to a halt.

Post reply on HN