Diagnostic page for Google.com
41–50 of 75 posts
Re: Diagnostic page for Google.com
#42Could someone tell me more about those network codes ?
Where do they come from ? Specifics to Google or following some standard ?
Re: Diagnostic page for Google.com
#43Re: Diagnostic page for Google.com
#44AS36040 (YOUTUBE), AS43515 (YOUTUBE), AS15169 (GOOGLE), AS54113 (FASTLY), AS36459 (GITHUB), AS16509 (AMAZON-02), AS14618 (AMAZON-AES), AS16509 (AMAZON-02), AS38895 (AMAZON-AS-AP) and so on. Could someone tell me more about those network codes ? Where do they come from ? Specifics to Google or following some standard ?
Re: Diagnostic page for Google.com
#45AS36040 (YOUTUBE), AS43515 (YOUTUBE), AS15169 (GOOGLE), AS54113 (FASTLY), AS36459 (GITHUB), AS16509 (AMAZON-02), AS14618 (AMAZON-AES), AS16509 (AMAZON-02), AS38895 (AMAZON-AS-AP) and so on. Could someone tell me more about those network codes ? Where do they come from ? Specifics to Google or following some standard ?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autonomous_System_(Internet)
Basically if you get IPs from ARIN or another RIR:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regional_Internet_registry
You get a name on your block.
Re: Diagnostic page for Google.com
#46And for DuckDuckGo, http://www.google.com/safebrowsing/diagnostic?site=duckduckg...
"Of the 153 pages we tested on the site over the past 90 days...." That's a small sample.
Re: Diagnostic page for Google.com
#47AS36040 (YOUTUBE), AS43515 (YOUTUBE), AS15169 (GOOGLE), AS54113 (FASTLY), AS36459 (GITHUB), AS16509 (AMAZON-02), AS14618 (AMAZON-AES), AS16509 (AMAZON-02), AS38895 (AMAZON-AS-AP) and so on. Could someone tell me more about those network codes ? Where do they come from ? Specifics to Google or following some standard ?
http://www.cidr-report.org/cgi-bin/as-report?as=AS15169&view...
Complexities aside - this is how your Internet works.
Re: Diagnostic page for Google.com
#48Re: Diagnostic page for Google.com
#49GitHub's is also not clean: https://www.google.com/safebrowsing/diagnostic?site=github.c...
Re: Diagnostic page for Google.com
#50http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=microsoft.com
Makes you wonder how come M$ doesn't make their site more compatible? As a multi-billion dollar company, they should have higher standards and meet the W3 standards.