“I paid $25 for an Invisible Boyfriend, and I think I might be in love”
71–80 of 265 posts
Re: “I paid $25 for an Invisible Boyfriend, and I think I might be in love”
#72[deleted]
Re: “I paid $25 for an Invisible Boyfriend, and I think I might be in love”
#73Or Rhondas. Women know what women want from a fake boyfriend service. What subterfuge is needed to fool the parents, what parents expect, etc. The text exchange about Downton Abbey makes me suspect that their staff are, at least partly, female.
Re: “I paid $25 for an Invisible Boyfriend, and I think I might be in love”
#74Earlier quoted context omitted.
I wonder how OK it is in their relationship to say things like that. That's obviously a joke, but it still comes quite bitter when such phrases are then revealed to general public.
No it doesn't, it comes across as a light hearted joke. Context is important as is apparently a thicker skin.
To a guy on the receiving end, its "buck up, pussy" which seems unfair. Men's feelings deserve validation too. Shamefully, the gender dual standard continues even to the younger ultra-liberal crowd who dominate HN.
Re: “I paid $25 for an Invisible Boyfriend, and I think I might be in love”
#75A perfect application of the Forer effect: humans have an amazing ability to interpret what can apply to anyone as having special significance for themselves. It's the same reason why horoscopes and fortune cookies work. Stepping back and thinking logically, it's easy to see why their messages might apply to a lot of people. But when you're reading one, you can't help but think, "Ah! It says that I would encounter ad…
> No matter how deeply we trust our logical conclusions, our emotional response remains the same. We can't help but feel worthier when we're being praised (even by computers ...), hurt when we're being insulted, and connected when we're being connected with. I just started playing The Walking Dead. In one scene, after another character saved Clementine from a zombie before I could, the game said, "Clementine remember…
Re: “I paid $25 for an Invisible Boyfriend, and I think I might be in love”
#76Edit: before anyone questions it, I am not saying that in any derogatory manner. Just a similar concept in a way, though obviously this has very different value proposition.
Re: “I paid $25 for an Invisible Boyfriend, and I think I might be in love”
#77A perfect application of the Forer effect: humans have an amazing ability to interpret what can apply to anyone as having special significance for themselves. It's the same reason why horoscopes and fortune cookies work. Stepping back and thinking logically, it's easy to see why their messages might apply to a lot of people. But when you're reading one, you can't help but think, "Ah! It says that I would encounter ad…
> No matter how deeply we trust our logical conclusions, our emotional response remains the same. We can't help but feel worthier when we're being praised (even by computers ...), hurt when we're being insulted, and connected when we're being connected with. I just started playing The Walking Dead. In one scene, after another character saved Clementine from a zombie before I could, the game said, "Clementine remember…
Re: “I paid $25 for an Invisible Boyfriend, and I think I might be in love”
#78Re: “I paid $25 for an Invisible Boyfriend, and I think I might be in love”
#79Re: “I paid $25 for an Invisible Boyfriend, and I think I might be in love”
#80Earlier quoted context omitted.
No it doesn't, it comes across as a light hearted joke. Context is important as is apparently a thicker skin.
As the aphorism goes 'many a true word was said in jest' [must be from Shakespeare, surely?].