Earlier quoted context omitted.
> No one should force any company anything. It's a company's choice to do native apps, web apps, or whatever they like. I disagree with this for a couple reasons. (The first sentence is easy to disagree with but I won't engage it as a strawman and will assume you mean it in a very narrow sense). The reason is that I don't believe that it's purely a company's choice to create native apps, web apps, or whatever they li…
As soon as someone decentralizes social networking the way bitcoin decentralized money, all those proprietary silos will be disrupted. And we have built the system to do it. http://platform.qbix.com
BlackBerry CEO Wants FCC to Make Developing BlackBerry Apps Mandatory
41–50 of 57 posts
Re: BlackBerry CEO Wants FCC to Make Developing BlackBerry Apps Mandatory
#42By the time we hit TechCrunch it's being worded as, "... if a company makes an app for iOS and Android, they must also make a version for BlackBerry and all other operating systems."
Good link bait though.
Re: BlackBerry CEO Wants FCC to Make Developing BlackBerry Apps Mandatory
#43Re: BlackBerry CEO Wants FCC to Make Developing BlackBerry Apps Mandatory
#44I've recently purchased a BlackBerry Passport and i absolutely love the device, I have a OnePlus, Nexus 6, and a MotoG as well and the square screen format and the keyboard just take it home for me.
As far as internet browsing, reading, and light content creation goes the Passport is by far the best phone out there atm. It's also one of the first devices in which BB decided to put not only good but virtually top of the line hardware so you are getting a quad core 801 snapdragon, with 3GB of RAM and 32GB + SD card.
I would wish that the BB market place would actually get some love it looks like the Android market from 2008-9 where 99% of the apps are scam, malware, overpriced shortcut apps, and bible and point me to mecca apps.
Even the "built for BB" apps on the market tend to run worse than their Android versions running in the Android Runtime Environment. And since even Google Services can be ported to BB OS10 there isn't even an issue with apps that require Google Account/Play Services any more.
Re: BlackBerry CEO Wants FCC to Make Developing BlackBerry Apps Mandatory
#45I've done it, and hearing that makes me want to delete it. BB developer tools are horrible. BB ignores developer questions on their own forums, even though they appear to have about as much traffic as my blog: Almost none. Also, the 90s called. It wants it's developer portal back. It actually asks if you want to restrict your app to certain carriers, (please, tell me more about neutrality!) and for export license num…
Google play allows you to do this too.
Re: BlackBerry CEO Wants FCC to Make Developing BlackBerry Apps Mandatory
#46I've done it, and hearing that makes me want to delete it. BB developer tools are horrible. BB ignores developer questions on their own forums, even though they appear to have about as much traffic as my blog: Almost none. Also, the 90s called. It wants it's developer portal back. It actually asks if you want to restrict your app to certain carriers, (please, tell me more about neutrality!) and for export license num…
> It actually asks if you want to restrict your app to certain carriers, Google play allows you to do this too.
Re: BlackBerry CEO Wants FCC to Make Developing BlackBerry Apps Mandatory
#47Re: BlackBerry CEO Wants FCC to Make Developing BlackBerry Apps Mandatory
#48I've done it, and hearing that makes me want to delete it. BB developer tools are horrible. BB ignores developer questions on their own forums, even though they appear to have about as much traffic as my blog: Almost none. Also, the 90s called. It wants it's developer portal back. It actually asks if you want to restrict your app to certain carriers, (please, tell me more about neutrality!) and for export license num…
An "API neutrality" proposal would make more sense. E.g. Apple wouldn't need to develop iMessage clients for non-Apple platforms, but they would not be able to block non-Apple platform client apps (developed by anyone) from connecting to the API. See HTTP, IMAP, Exchange, NFS, Windows SMB, etc.
Let's say this hypothetical "API neutrality" proposal were to go through -- note the actual letter from Blackberry's CEO never mentioned the phrase "API"[1] -- then Apple might simply stop developing iMessage. Unless your hypothetical law forces them to make the API available and keep it available indefinitely to all comers, effectively subsidizing their competitors out of their own pocket.
[1] http://blogs.blackberry.com/2015/01/blackberry-net-neutralit...
Re: BlackBerry CEO Wants FCC to Make Developing BlackBerry Apps Mandatory
#49Earlier quoted context omitted.
> What they're getting at is that services should leverage open technologies so that nobody's platform gets shut out No one should force any company anything. It's a company's choice to do native apps, web apps, or whatever they like. They are probably missing some part of the market by not developing for some platforms or not having mobile versions of their apps - that's their problem, and it makes them ripe for com…
> No one should force any company anything. It's a company's choice to do native apps, web apps, or whatever they like. I disagree with this for a couple reasons. (The first sentence is easy to disagree with but I won't engage it as a strawman and will assume you mean it in a very narrow sense). The reason is that I don't believe that it's purely a company's choice to create native apps, web apps, or whatever they li…
If Blackberry merely wanted "recognition that they can not compete," they could put out a press release.
Anytime you write a letter to Congress that includes the phrase "must be mandated" -- as Blackberry's CEO did -- it's abundantly clear you're asking a new law.
Re: BlackBerry CEO Wants FCC to Make Developing BlackBerry Apps Mandatory
#50Oh, okay, never mind. Free market for the win.