Live data from Hacker News

Kim Dotcom launches end-to-end encrypted audio and video chat service

thenextweb.com

11–20 of 27 posts

Re: Kim Dotcom launches end-to-end encrypted audio and video chat service

#11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Also he's admitted to snitching on people to law enforcement for his own benefit. I wouldn't trust the man with anything private. Ever.

Good thing we have the Government to protect us. At least someone we can trust with all we do online.

No, the point is not to trust anybody (more realistically: vigorously evaluate your Web of Trust), but you should especially not trust someone who is known to be untrustworthy.

Re: Kim Dotcom launches end-to-end encrypted audio and video chat service

#12
It's a move that makes sense - his business of allowing you to share and download files puts him at odds with authorities. Given this nature of this business his clients would motivated to use secure communications. He will be able to market to the sort of people who need privacy and have used his services before.

If you should trust him [1], and if you like him are another matter - but clearly there's a business opportunity for someone who can market to the megaupload crowd.

[1] https://anoninsiders.net/mega-960/

------------------------------

Edit: Changed 'like' to 'motivated' as it describes the situation better (see Zigurd's comment below)

Re: Kim Dotcom launches end-to-end encrypted audio and video chat service

#13

It's a move that makes sense - his business of allowing you to share and download files puts him at odds with authorities. Given this nature of this business his clients would motivated to use secure communications. He will be able to market to the sort of people who need privacy and have used his services before. If you should trust him [1], and if you like him are another matter - but clearly there's a business opp…

I wish he would use his stature to promote existing solutions like Jitsi or Tox. That won't contribute to his bank account though, so it's a non-starter.

Re: Kim Dotcom launches end-to-end encrypted audio and video chat service

#14

It's a move that makes sense - his business of allowing you to share and download files puts him at odds with authorities. Given this nature of this business his clients would motivated to use secure communications. He will be able to market to the sort of people who need privacy and have used his services before. If you should trust him [1], and if you like him are another matter - but clearly there's a business opp…

I wish he would use his stature to promote existing solutions like Jitsi or Tox. That won't contribute to his bank account though, so it's a non-starter.

I feel like tox is slowly dying, https://github.com/irungentoo/toxcore/issues/1186

Re: Kim Dotcom launches end-to-end encrypted audio and video chat service

#15

It's a move that makes sense - his business of allowing you to share and download files puts him at odds with authorities. Given this nature of this business his clients would motivated to use secure communications. He will be able to market to the sort of people who need privacy and have used his services before. If you should trust him [1], and if you like him are another matter - but clearly there's a business opp…

> his clients would like to talk to each other without someone listening in

That also encompasses almost everyone on Earth.

Re: Kim Dotcom launches end-to-end encrypted audio and video chat service

#16

He was a professional conman (before he made money with mega by actively pushing pirated content) known for making false claims, so be weary about the reliability of his encryption claims.

People forget this. I remember in the early 2000s when he was known as Kimble and ran pump and dump scams, and had a website of him on private jets and fancy cars partying with his illicit gains. Now he is known as some anti authority hero to many.

Re: Kim Dotcom launches end-to-end encrypted audio and video chat service

#17
post #15

It's a move that makes sense - his business of allowing you to share and download files puts him at odds with authorities. Given this nature of this business his clients would motivated to use secure communications. He will be able to market to the sort of people who need privacy and have used his services before. If you should trust him [1], and if you like him are another matter - but clearly there's a business opp…

> his clients would like to talk to each other without someone listening in That also encompasses almost everyone on Earth.

It should. But as many have pointed out here, in reality people need motivation, and most people don't have it. Sex, drugs, copying, political dissidence, etc. You have to start with a market of the motivated, who may already be using less-convenient tools.

Re: Kim Dotcom launches end-to-end encrypted audio and video chat service

#18

He was a professional conman (before he made money with mega by actively pushing pirated content) known for making false claims, so be weary about the reliability of his encryption claims.

If you don't trust Kim Dotcom to deliver, there's always Tox.

https://tox.im/

Re: Kim Dotcom launches end-to-end encrypted audio and video chat service

#19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I wish he would use his stature to promote existing solutions like Jitsi or Tox. That won't contribute to his bank account though, so it's a non-starter.

I feel like tox is slowly dying, https://github.com/irungentoo/toxcore/issues/1186

If there are multiple dissatisfied devs, why not fork?

Re: Kim Dotcom launches end-to-end encrypted audio and video chat service

#20
post #10

just like ... Skype?

Skype is getting more and more useless with every iteration. Encryption is gone, file transfer first stopped to recognize direct LAN connection between clients and now some of the files get stored "in the cloud", the design is just atrocious, advertisements annoying (thank gods for workarounds). And yesterday my 5.9 installation stopped working, so I have to put up with that.

Encryption is gone

Do you have a link to that? The last time I looked at the news, Skype was using SSL to servers so Microsoft could see the data transferred, and while that's not ideal, it's still very different from your implication that everything in the protocol is now transmitted in the clear.

Post reply on HN