Live data from Hacker News

Students Gain Access to Files on Admission to Stanford

nytimes.com

1–10 of 100 posts

Re: Students Gain Access to Files on Admission to Stanford

#3
If/once these become public record, does that create any legal issues for the university? Given how easy it is to twist informal speech like an e-mail out of context it does make ya wonder. A boderline-defamatory remark made public seems quite different something kept private.

Re: Students Gain Access to Files on Admission to Stanford

#6
The newsletter from The Fountain Hopper (who appears to have discovered this) has some more interesting details:

When you apply to Stanford, your application gets assigned at least two admissions 'readers.'

FoHo knows you get a third (specialized) reader if you're a legacy or a 'minority' (though we're not too sure how that's defined). We also think you get an additional reader if you're an athlete or development kid (i.e. you donated $$$).

These readers (a mix of full-time admissions officers and seasonal hires) are tasked with reading thousands of applications in just a few weeks and distilling each of them into an concise, 300-ish word summary.

http://us9.campaign-archive2.com/?u=c9d7a555374df02a66219b57...

Re: Students Gain Access to Files on Admission to Stanford

#10
post #3

If/once these become public record, does that create any legal issues for the university? Given how easy it is to twist informal speech like an e-mail out of context it does make ya wonder. A boderline-defamatory remark made public seems quite different something kept private.

FERPA doesn't make them public records, it just allows a student to access their own educational records.

I think a student could release their own records but that wouldn't fall under defamation from what I know.

Post reply on HN