Earlier quoted context omitted.
As far as I can tell, opening the universities to the masses damages the classes, standards, and student-faculty relations to the point where those who really 'ought' to be at university rather than at technical colleges don't benefit in the same way as previously. Perhaps this is just elitism, but I get the feeling that the 'bright' entering students are still the 'bright' graduating students, but gain much less dee…
Nice. I see another problem. The bright are bored, school is tedious, and they go unrecognized. Then the less intelligent "excel." Good thing AI research will need more and more intelligent people.
Education Inflation
31–35 of 35 posts
Re: Education Inflation
#32- B.Sc. Learn enough to enable you to get on the job training
- M.Sc. Meaningless, just a stamina test to check if you can focus adequately on a narrow field.
- Ph.D. A sort of a license to do research.
A 'degree' is just a 'key' to your first job. From there onwards its YOU, your capabilities and most important your character. In many instances a Ph.D. will be viewed by prospective Employers as a disadvantage calling you (theoretical) rather than (practical). The greatest benefit of a PhD to me was it developed my analytical and research skills, which I could apply in different settings (i.e. not just Engineering). Its downside being too analytical screwed up quite a few personal relationships :)
Re: Education Inflation
#33At a top 10 CS school, your experience would probably have been very, very different.
Re: Education Inflation
#34Earlier quoted context omitted.
If his peer group is in fact white, then it's not racist, just a statement of reality. And as for competition, most people only care about competing within their own peer/status group. And yes, it is bad for the economy if whites are significantly under invested in engineering. It's bad for the economy if anyone or any group is under invested in engineering. Anything "assumed" or implied by his post, is added by you,…
See now, you just equated peer group with status group. If you believe that "white" can be a peer group, then that seems to imply that you also believe that "white" can be a status group, which is a far more troubling scenario. Racism is not about making disparaging remarks about someone of another race. It's about prejudging, i.e. assuming that certain things are true, just because of that person's race.
Re: Education Inflation
#35Earlier quoted context omitted.
See now, you just equated peer group with status group. If you believe that "white" can be a peer group, then that seems to imply that you also believe that "white" can be a status group, which is a far more troubling scenario. Racism is not about making disparaging remarks about someone of another race. It's about prejudging, i.e. assuming that certain things are true, just because of that person's race.
I'm saying that one's peer group is almost alway's one's status group. People don't personally compare themselves/compare self-worth versus a random sample of the population. We compare ourselves to friends, neighbors, classmates, and co-workers.
The more I read in this thread, the more I start to believe racism is deeply embedded in the American psyche.