Judge: Mobile Phone Ringtones are Not Concerts
1–8 of 8 posts
Re: Judge: Mobile Phone Ringtones are Not Concerts
#2Re: Judge: Mobile Phone Ringtones are Not Concerts
#3Re: Judge: Mobile Phone Ringtones are Not Concerts
#4Re: Judge: Mobile Phone Ringtones are Not Concerts
#5The advice from our lawyers was to just pay up unless we had the money to fight them in the 'Rate Court' http://www1.nysd.uscourts.gov Glad someone finally did.
Re: Judge: Mobile Phone Ringtones are Not Concerts
#6I can't believe someone actually wasted their money, and tax payer money, to take this to court. The lawyers must be laughing all the way to the bank.
Re: Judge: Mobile Phone Ringtones are Not Concerts
#7I can't believe someone actually wasted their money, and tax payer money, to take this to court. The lawyers must be laughing all the way to the bank.
They won with musical instrument shops that do have to pay a public performance license in case a customer plays a known tune while testing a new instrument
Re: Judge: Mobile Phone Ringtones are Not Concerts
#8Earlier quoted context omitted.
They won with musical instrument shops that do have to pay a public performance license in case a customer plays a known tune while testing a new instrument
I'm sorry but that's fucking retarded.
John Collins, 57, who runs a software company from a room at his home in Welwyn Garden City, Hertfordshire, received letters saying he needed a licence for the classical CDs he played while working. "If my wife Susan brings me a cup of tea and hears the music then I might be liable," he said.
Even dogs and cats do not always escape targeting. Follybridge cattery near Peterborough and Stokenchurch dog rescue centre in Buckinghamshire, which play Terry Wogan’s Radio 2 show to their "guests", were both told they would need a licence in case any workers heard the music.