What Is Aging? Most Scientists Still Get It Wrong
11–20 of 137 posts
Re: What Is Aging? Most Scientists Still Get It Wrong
#12Isn't this just group selection again? Has this view become more accepted nowadays among biologists? There are very compelling arguments against it.
Maybe a better way to phrase it would be to say that aging has evolved to benefit the offspring, which traditionally happened to make up a significant part of the community?
Re: What Is Aging? Most Scientists Still Get It Wrong
#13Aging is encoded in our DNA with a purpose, if we will be able to fully understand how DNA works me might be able to partially disable it but will we want to? maybe when we will reach that level of knowledge we will also have the wisdom to understand the implications.
Of course we will want to. I am sure there will be lots of side effects, but almost anything beats dying.
Re: What Is Aging? Most Scientists Still Get It Wrong
#14This is truly the most amazing time to be alive (so far). No matter what repercussions the destruction of aging might have, it awes me that we talk of dramatically extended life and the colonization of the stars not only as something feasible, but even possible within the next century.
If you're in the group of people privileged to have access to those innovations, yes. For everyone else it kind of sucks seeing what the elite get to play with.
Re: What Is Aging? Most Scientists Still Get It Wrong
#15Aging is encoded in our DNA with a purpose, if we will be able to fully understand how DNA works me might be able to partially disable it but will we want to? maybe when we will reach that level of knowledge we will also have the wisdom to understand the implications.
Do you want to die? Of course we will want to. I am sure there will be lots of side effects, but almost anything beats dying.
IMHO this is the wrong question to ask. As long as you continue to age, and your body degrades, you'll eventually not object to dying any more, because living isn't much fun.
The much more interesting question is: do you want to age beyond a certain point?
Re: What Is Aging? Most Scientists Still Get It Wrong
#16Earlier quoted context omitted.
Do you want to die? Of course we will want to. I am sure there will be lots of side effects, but almost anything beats dying.
> Do you want to die? IMHO this is the wrong question to ask. As long as you continue to age, and your body degrades, you'll eventually not object to dying any more, because living isn't much fun. The much more interesting question is: do you want to age beyond a certain point?
Re: What Is Aging? Most Scientists Still Get It Wrong
#17Aging is encoded in our DNA with a purpose, if we will be able to fully understand how DNA works me might be able to partially disable it but will we want to? maybe when we will reach that level of knowledge we will also have the wisdom to understand the implications.
Do you want to die? Of course we will want to. I am sure there will be lots of side effects, but almost anything beats dying.
Someone must have written sci-fi of this.
Re: What Is Aging? Most Scientists Still Get It Wrong
#18Earlier quoted context omitted.
Do you want to die? Of course we will want to. I am sure there will be lots of side effects, but almost anything beats dying.
> Do you want to die? IMHO this is the wrong question to ask. As long as you continue to age, and your body degrades, you'll eventually not object to dying any more, because living isn't much fun. The much more interesting question is: do you want to age beyond a certain point?
Re: What Is Aging? Most Scientists Still Get It Wrong
#19I wonder what are the currently best established DIY techniques to slow aging. I know low food intake could help, but what else?
There is nothing else. Basically, calorie restriction works, and nothing else does. I recommend Fight Aging! if you are interested. https://www.fightaging.org/faq/
Re: What Is Aging? Most Scientists Still Get It Wrong
#20I wonder what are the currently best established DIY techniques to slow aging. I know low food intake could help, but what else?
There is nothing else. Basically, calorie restriction works, and nothing else does. I recommend Fight Aging! if you are interested. https://www.fightaging.org/faq/
We don't even know that for sure. There were two big studies in rhesus monkeys which disagreed on that.[1] Evidence from mice, where this idea originated, is dubious at best considering the mice most studies use.
[1] http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/02/science/a-new-salvo-in-deb...