Live data from Hacker News

Why are Facebook, Digg and Twitter So Hard To Scale?

highscalability.com

51–52 of 52 posts

Re: Why are Facebook, Digg and Twitter So Hard To Scale?

#51
post #47
post #45

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In some models, sure, but is that true in Facebook's? Does anything go beyond one degree? I can't think of anything, really. If X and Y becomes friends, X's friends and Y's friends see it in their feed ("inbox"), but nobody else. Same goes for tagging someone in a photo, etc.

Ad targeting, what's hot in your network, friend recommenders, etc. are all essentially ranking problems. They're moving more in that direction, definitely.

Word. True. I knew there was something I wasn't thinking of.

Re: Why are Facebook, Digg and Twitter So Hard To Scale?

#52
post #49

Earlier quoted context omitted.

At the same time, facebook can simply drop messages on the floor if they're bottlenecked, so they have less strict scaling requirements.

Twitter has guaranteed delivery? Are you sure? The killer app of Facebook - poking - does need to be reliable ;-)

I'm pretty sure Twitter is "guaranteed delivery", but thats just my naive user expectation.

Poking, while needing to be reliable is a 1:1 activity, so light on writes and easy to read, whereas broadcasting is difficult because of the wide variance in update frequency and number of followers from user to user.

Post reply on HN