Live data from Hacker News

Adblock Plus is probably the reason Firefox and Chrome are such memory hogs

extremetech.com

81–90 of 419 posts

Re: Adblock Plus is probably the reason Firefox and Chrome are such memory hogs

#81
post #14

I used to not do Adblock, because you know, ads make the internet go round and all that. But with the "download here"-button ads, there is no way to know what button to press anymore. Now installing Adblock is a requirement.

I'd love an adblocker with a blacklist instead of whitelist so I could keep the ads on for the long tail of my browsing and remove them only on sites that go overboard.

Re: Adblock Plus is probably the reason Firefox and Chrome are such memory hogs

#82

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't think I'm a 'normal' user, having a 100 or so tabs open is actually idle time for me. When I'm busy it can be three times as much.

Three hundred tabs! Perhaps you might enjoy a cool feature called bookmarking. How do you keep track of them all? I get to 10 tabs before my Sheldon Cooper kicks in.

I use bookmarks too. The way it works is that while I read I open up links and make notes as I work my way through a page, by the time I'm done there is a few lines added to the notebook and maybe a few new tabs open. Little by little I exhaust the subject and at some point all the links on the subject are already visited. A bit like a human crawler. But the peaks in the middle are easily in the 100's of tabs. This is the most efficient way that I've found, bookmarking works but then you will still need to open those bookmarks later, much easier to just open the tab right away.

It's very much a paper analogy, highlight the interesting bits, add new stuff to the 'to read' stack, and when the 'to read' stack is empty you're done and the notes file contains the extracted information.

The note taking extension I use is called scrapbook and I couldn't live without it. I also use vertical tabs which makes it much easier to work with large numbers of tabs.

Re: Adblock Plus is probably the reason Firefox and Chrome are such memory hogs

#83
post #2

People are using µBlock now for precisely this reason. https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/%C2%B5Block-vs.-ABP:-... https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/%C2%B5block/cjpalh... https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock

I tried µBlock but it seems to be extremely trigger happy. For example Youtube front page doesn't show any videos and Facebook doesn't load at all (basically it blocks everything other than its side bar). I can obviously white list those sites but my concern is that next time I visit some site for the first time I will not know if its broken or just µBlock acting up. ----- EDIT I reinstalled the plugin and the proble…

> Youtube front page doesn't show any videos

I see videos all fine on Youtube front-page, using out-of-the-box filter lists. That kind of issue was never reported for uBlock. I would need to know exactly what filter lists you were using, including custom filters.

uBlock relies on 3rd-party filter lists to do the job, specifically, out of the box:

    - EasyList
    - EasyPrivacy
    - Fanboy's Social Blocking List
    - Peter Lowe's Ad Servers
    - Malware domains
So if you think it blocks too much, un-select the filter lists you do not want.

Bottom line, whatever filter lists you use in uBlock, you will get the same results with the same lists with ABP.

Re: Adblock Plus is probably the reason Firefox and Chrome are such memory hogs

#84

I use a modified hosts file instead which is much better. See http://someonewhocares.org/hosts/ Remember the web is pull not push.

Hosts files only work when the ads and other trash are not served from the same domain, and of course the bigger operators do everything they can to make you lose some critical functionality if you block their ad serving IPs.

So you'll need to go to the URL level at a minimum if you don't want to use some important functionality.

Re: Adblock Plus is probably the reason Firefox and Chrome are such memory hogs

#85

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Even though chromium is open it won't be good for the ecosystem. You didn't mention how or why. Personally, I hope Mozilla goes away and some other group comes along to fill the void because I don't think Mozilla consists of the right group of people to make anything worth using. I'm not using any Mozilla browser until they learn how to respect the native operating system UI guidelines. Instead they're trying to bu…

Awww, looks like I have an unpopular opinion. You should totally censor it and make it disappear so that your world can be sterile and comfortable once again!

Perhaps it's less about popularity and more your delivery.

Re: Adblock Plus is probably the reason Firefox and Chrome are such memory hogs

#86
My current favorite solution for blocking the more annoying ads and increasing security while preserving a low-latency browsing experience: Click-to-play for Flash Player (and all the other plug-ins).

There are lots of gray boxes now all over the web, but I prefer them over resource-hungry attention-grabbing Flash ads.

Re: Adblock Plus is probably the reason Firefox and Chrome are such memory hogs

#87
post #57

Noscript is not an option anymore. Too many sites rely on javascript. I'll take the memory hit every time to use adblock.

I would counter and say NoScript is still an option.

I want to control what sites I allow to execute scripts in my browser rather than give global authority to any random site I may happen to land on.

I see no value in allowing scripts from Facebook or Twitter, for example, to run on any of the sites I visit.

Re: Adblock Plus is probably the reason Firefox and Chrome are such memory hogs

#88

I don't even use an adblocker. I simply use ghostery to block trackers and almost no ads being there anymore is a nice side-effect.

Ghostery is proprietary software, and it's reporting your usage back to trackers if you enable Ghostrank. You would be better protected running Privacy Badger by the EFF. It's Free Software, and it doesn't track you.

https://www.eff.org/privacybadger

Re: Adblock Plus is probably the reason Firefox and Chrome are such memory hogs

#89

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Even though chromium is open it won't be good for the ecosystem. You didn't mention how or why. Personally, I hope Mozilla goes away and some other group comes along to fill the void because I don't think Mozilla consists of the right group of people to make anything worth using. I'm not using any Mozilla browser until they learn how to respect the native operating system UI guidelines. Instead they're trying to bu…

Awww, looks like I have an unpopular opinion. You should totally censor it and make it disappear so that your world can be sterile and comfortable once again!

Nah, that fate should be reserved for Mozilla, apparently.
Post reply on HN