Live data from Hacker News

The Interview

stripe.com

101–110 of 156 posts

Re: The Interview

#101
post #41

I hope Stripe developers didn't write this code. I got the movie for free, jesus ... http://imgur.com/a/hf8FZ - and I didn't get a job after my interview with Stripe earlier this year.

That you posted this comment is a good indicator that Stripe made the right decision not to hire you. It shows a lack of professionalism, judgment, maturity, etc.

On the other hand, he'd be a great fit for a security/pentesting company.

Re: The Interview

#103
post #92

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sony Pictures Entertainment probably no longer has sole control over distribution elsewhere in the world. This close to the original planned release date, they likely have deals in place for nearly every other region, and thus partners to work with to arrange for release. In fact, it's entirely possible that those deals were in place before filming even began, and some money may have changed hands at that time, helpi…

Too bad for them... actually I've debated this type of thing with you before: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5276226

Where you said, "I'm just going to pirate it, end of story."

Your position is pretty easily summed up then.

Re: The Interview

#104
post #84
post #76

They want a credit card, they want a CVC for a $6 purchase, and they only have a domain-only SSL cert. Sloppy security, people.

How is that "sloppy security"? Honest question.

See "http://pciguru.wordpress.com/2013/06/30/developers-beware-st.... If you accept a CVC or CVC2, the requirements are much stricter, because an attacker who can get hold of a card number with the CVC/CVC2 can buy more expensive items.

Stripe works by having pages invoke their "stripe.js" within the host page. The risk of mixing payment processing input into a general site is that anything that can access the DOM can patch "stripe.js" and tap the credit card data. Since this page is very likely to be attacked, that's a big risk here.

The page uses several off-site Javascript files. Attacks through the CDN that distributes "bootstrap.js", for example, might work.

In 2015, payment card requirements are tightening up. Sites which use third party processors like Stripe will probably have to put credit card entry into an iframe which comes directly from the third party processor. This makes the attack surface smaller.

Re: The Interview

#105
post #8

If it's not free, I hope everyone buys it instead of waiting for a torrent. We should support online releases.

I just bought it through Google Play with the expectations of being able to watch it offline (since Internet while traveling is hard to find!). Turns out that, if I want to watch it offline, I have to either download it to one of my Android devices or my Chromebook. I'm downloading it to my Chromebook now, but it's a damn shame I can't download it to something that actually has a decent screen.

Re: The Interview

#106
post #75

You can download this as a DRM-free file with a simple curl command. Most people probably wouldn't bother, however, because Stripe makes it so easy to just watch directly your browser, no need to go through the hassle of downloading anything or needing the hard drive space. This is a great example of content providers finally beating piracy by providing a simpler method of content distribution. I hope more movies com…

I'd like to agree with you, but the easier than pirating part of your comment only seems to apply if you're from the US (correct me, if it's available in other countries). I'd really like to pay, but it seems I have to resort to other sources.

Besides other, admittedly far from mainstream movies did this a lot better - "Sleepwalk with me" or last years highly praised "Computer Chess" offered a DRM-free, 1080p download and a streaming option, both without region-lock and for a reasonable price. Still an exception unfortunately.

Re: The Interview

#108

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>> "For the ones who don't have it available in their country (like me) are left with no other option :(" Come on. Your option is to wait. From the site: "we do hope to see the release of The Interview across the globe"

Eh. It takes more effort to regionally lock something on the Internet than not. Sony makes this sound like they'll go to every effort eventually to release this movie across the globe - doing that would require so much less effort than they're currently expending. When you say "wait" you're asking people to assume Sony will get around to considering them equal members of the Internet society. Or they can just assert…

I agree with everything you say - but it takes nothing away from my original point. The OP stated that he had 'no choice' but to pirate the movie. He does have a choice. He can wait for them to make it available to him - the cinema release was originally US only anyway. Or his other option is just to not watch it. I'm personally tired of the argument 'I had no option to pirate it'. It's rubbish. It's simply somebody's way of reliving themselves of any guilt or feeling of wrong doing from pirating. Pirate if I you want, just don't make bullshit excuses for it.

Re: The Interview

#109
post #84

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How is that "sloppy security"? Honest question.

See " http://pciguru.wordpress.com/2013/06/30/developers-beware-st... . If you accept a CVC or CVC2, the requirements are much stricter, because an attacker who can get hold of a card number with the CVC/CVC2 can buy more expensive items. Stripe works by having pages invoke their "stripe.js" within the host page. The risk of mixing payment processing input into a general site is that anything that can access the DOM…

Stripe checkout does use an iframe from checkout.stripe.com for the payment form.

Re: The Interview

#110
post #17

It looks like it's available on Google Play now: https://play.google.com/store/movies/details/The_Interview?i... and YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ed2kSuKqfz0

Not available in your country. Well I guess I won't be paying to watch this crappy movie.

The logistics of doing an unplanned online launch are pretty large, and launching in lots of different markets adds a lot of complexity (legal issues, customer support issues in multiple languages, etc.). I'm surprised they managed to launch in the US in time for Christmas.

It's disappointing it isn't also launching internationally, but I'm optimistic - if this makes lots of money, then it will prove that it makes sense to launch new movies online. Then in the future we may see more movies launch like this, and with more preparation time, hopefully also internationally.

Post reply on HN