Live data from Hacker News

Four Areas of Legal Ripe for Disruption by Smart Startups

lawtechnologytoday.org

11–20 of 72 posts

Re: Four Areas of Legal Ripe for Disruption by Smart Startups

#11
The article mentions some interesting things, but I have a few quibbles:

> But even with today’s modern communication tools, both customer experience and lawyer workflow have remained stagnant.

At a large firm, legal practice is unrecognizable compared to even 10-15 years ago. Everything is electronic: filing and docketing, document collection/scanning/OCR, legal research, document management (DMS + version control). Everyone communicates almost exclusively via e-mail, and remote work facilities are ubiquitous.

To the extent that technology is available that's not getting adopted, it's because it's not good enough. Predictive coding can be very helpful, but it also has a fixed setup and training overhead that makes it less efficient for smaller matters. That's why arguably the biggest shift in discovery in the last 15 years hasn't been to automating it, but outsourcing it to contract lawyers.

In the area of research, Westlaw and Lexis still rule because of their completeness and accuracy. If I need a copy of some statute enacted in 1873 I can not only find it, but I can get original scans so I can verify the text is free of OCR errors.

Moreover, things that are easy on the rest of the web are not easy when it comes to legal (or scientific) research. PageRank, for example, works great when everyone searching for "skiing near Tahoe" is looking for the same popular pages. But when you're doing legal research, a lower-court case that directly addresses your issue but isn't widely cited is much more valuable than a highly-cited Supreme Court case that doesn't address your issue. And computers still don't really understand either what issue you're looking for or what issue a case is about. So ancient technology (search for this word near that word) still rules the day.

> There are good reasons for this, as law firms tend to be cost agonistic (since they pass costs directly to their client)

This is oft-stated, but economically fallacious. Price is a function of supply and demand. The client cares about total cost for a particular legal service; she doesn't care about how that cost is broken down. If the client's budget for a matter is $300,000, every dollar that goes to costs is a dollar that doesn't go to the law firm. This is true even if you're billing by the hour, because in the long run, a firm will raise rates until hours x rate = client budget.

Re: Four Areas of Legal Ripe for Disruption by Smart Startups

#13
post #2

It's hard to get excited about software for lawyers, and I think that's why Disco has flown under the radar a bit, but I think these guys are going to be huge. They've made exponential improvements in e-discovery software.

Having worked in e-discovery for many years, "exponential improvements" is a huge overstatement. What they have is in pretty much any e-discovery product on the market. And they are missing a huge piece--predictive coding and advanced analytics (email threading and near-dup are EXTREMELY common). If you are in NLP, ML and/or IR, the legal industry is probably one of the most exciting places to be. Huge datasets, avai…

Do you know of any companies doing that in the Seattle area?

Re: Four Areas of Legal Ripe for Disruption by Smart Startups

#15
post #9
post #6

This paralegal I know told me 2 years ago "I wish someone would automate discovery because it sucks right now". I wish I knew absolutely anything about it.

There are these guys: http://logikcull.com/ (And they're welcome.)

And they're thankful.

Re: Four Areas of Legal Ripe for Disruption by Smart Startups

#16
post #7

No mention of Smart Contracts?

Doesn't look like it. Perhaps you'd like to fill us in on it? If my guess of what it sounds like is anything what it actually is, then I'd be really curious about knowing more.

You can use a bitcoin-like system to build an agent that holds money in escrow and then automatically delivers it when a condition is met[1]. This is the simplest form of a "Smart Contract."

Most contracts are credible because their terms can be enforced by sanctioned violence. "Smart Contracts" are credible because they are enforced by distributed verifiable cryptographically-secure automation.

[1] For example, when the DMV database confirms that a certain car is now registered in my name, you automatically get 4 bitcoin.

Re: Four Areas of Legal Ripe for Disruption by Smart Startups

#17

I am quite interested to know more about Judicata. It was cofounded by Blake Masters (coauthor of Zero to One). Anyone have any info on it?

Last I spoke with the gang---unfortunately, some time ago---they were working on legal search. Great group of people. They've been stealthy of late.

FYI, Blake also blogged the notes on Peter Thiel's start-up lectures at Stanford.

Re: Four Areas of Legal Ripe for Disruption by Smart Startups

#19
post #6

This paralegal I know told me 2 years ago "I wish someone would automate discovery because it sucks right now". I wish I knew absolutely anything about it.

This is called eDiscovery, and people have been working on it for a good while, certainly longer than two years (I worked at a startup in this space, 2009-2010).

Re: Four Areas of Legal Ripe for Disruption by Smart Startups

#20
post #11

The article mentions some interesting things, but I have a few quibbles: > But even with today’s modern communication tools, both customer experience and lawyer workflow have remained stagnant. At a large firm, legal practice is unrecognizable compared to even 10-15 years ago. Everything is electronic: filing and docketing, document collection/scanning/OCR, legal research, document management (DMS + version control).…

One lawyer I talk to says that every single filing he makes at court has to be paper. He bought a wheely suitcase to carry all this documentation around to court.

If everything is electronic, his firm and the judges they deal with didn't get the message...

Post reply on HN