Live data from Hacker News

Are Christmas Lights in Series or Parallel?

wired.com

1–10 of 55 posts

Re: Are Christmas Lights in Series or Parallel?

#2
Oh interesting, I'd noticed that at some point between my childhood and now, burned out bulbs stopped taking out the entire rest of the light string. I wonder if the bypass wire is a new(ish) development, or if we just had cheap Christmas lights when I was younger.

Re: Are Christmas Lights in Series or Parallel?

#3
post #2

Oh interesting, I'd noticed that at some point between my childhood and now, burned out bulbs stopped taking out the entire rest of the light string. I wonder if the bypass wire is a new(ish) development, or if we just had cheap Christmas lights when I was younger.

You had cheap Christmas lights. We had both. We had the actual bubble lights. Those were more expensive at the time. A bulb could burn out in one of the bubblers and the remaining bubblers would work.

Re: Are Christmas Lights in Series or Parallel?

#4
Unfortunately, the bypass wire doesn't actually always burn out to make the rest of the lights work. There is a device called a LightKeeper pro that sends a larger "zap" through the string to encourage the needed bypass wire to burn out. Its saved me a bunch of time figuring out which bulb was bad in a string of lights.

Re: Are Christmas Lights in Series or Parallel?

#6
post #5

So why aren't the bulbs hooked up in parallel?

Probably to save wire, if you hooked em up in parallel you'd need to send a wire to every bulb from the outlet.

With 10 bulbs at 1 inch spacing, you're wiring 1 + 2 + 3 + ... + 9 + 10 = 55 inches of wire instead of 10

Follows a roughly N^2 law

Re: Are Christmas Lights in Series or Parallel?

#7
post #6
post #5

So why aren't the bulbs hooked up in parallel?

Probably to save wire, if you hooked em up in parallel you'd need to send a wire to every bulb from the outlet. With 10 bulbs at 1 inch spacing, you're wiring 1 + 2 + 3 + ... + 9 + 10 = 55 inches of wire instead of 10 Follows a roughly N^2 law

Huh? Why not just use two wires and connect one wire to the other with each bulb.

Like this: http://www.planetchristmas.com/Images/MinisA.gif

I think the real answer is that if you did it this way (in traditional pre-transformer light sets), each bulb would have to be rated for 120v, or whatever your local line voltage is, which would make them both more expensive, and more dangerous.

Re: Are Christmas Lights in Series or Parallel?

#9
post #6
post #5

So why aren't the bulbs hooked up in parallel?

Probably to save wire, if you hooked em up in parallel you'd need to send a wire to every bulb from the outlet. With 10 bulbs at 1 inch spacing, you're wiring 1 + 2 + 3 + ... + 9 + 10 = 55 inches of wire instead of 10 Follows a roughly N^2 law

Why would you need a separate wire for each bulb? Seems to me like you could have a ladder topology: two bus wires running from the outlet, and then the bulbs going between them.
Post reply on HN