I remember looking at this a few years ago. My main reason for not using it was the time it would have taken to tag all my files. Basically, if you have so many files that it's worth tagging them, you need to spend a lot of time tagging, and if you have so few that it's reasonable to tag them all, you don't need this system. If you have a manageable number but expect tagging to be useful in the near future, then this…
For similar reasons, I just can't bring myself to use OSX's tagging feature; it just seems like so much effort without a good use case. I'm not sure it helps that the defaults are simply colours, rather than real examples. And I don't really want to think about how files are shared (server, dropbox, google drive, usb stick) and do all the necessary research into how tags work in each and every case. I too would be in…
TMSU is a tool for tagging your files
41–50 of 65 posts
Re: TMSU is a tool for tagging your files
#42In a business setting, I often see people's desktops cluttered with files. It'd be nice to give them a virtual folder on the desktop where they can drag and drop files into in to it, with tags.
Re: TMSU is a tool for tagging your files
#43Earlier quoted context omitted.
Search doesn't help when you don't remember filename.
Sure it does when the search also investigates the contents of the files. For example, GMail and Outlook do this for mail items -- you don't need to know the subject, which is comparable to the file name, to retrieve an email -- and Google Desktop Search (discontinued) or Copernic does this for file systems. It is almost as if every system-retrievable item inside a file (e.g. every word in a text document) automatica…
Re: TMSU is a tool for tagging your files
#44I remember looking at this a few years ago. My main reason for not using it was the time it would have taken to tag all my files. Basically, if you have so many files that it's worth tagging them, you need to spend a lot of time tagging, and if you have so few that it's reasonable to tag them all, you don't need this system. If you have a manageable number but expect tagging to be useful in the near future, then this…
I tag all of my Firefox bookmarks. I've been meaning to export them out of Firefox and use some other kind of bookmark manager or write my own (perhaps integrating it in to Emacs). Something like this might help, if I make each bookmark in to a separate file.
Re: TMSU is a tool for tagging your files
#45Earlier quoted context omitted.
Search doesn't help when you don't remember filename.
Sure it does when the search also investigates the contents of the files. For example, GMail and Outlook do this for mail items -- you don't need to know the subject, which is comparable to the file name, to retrieve an email -- and Google Desktop Search (discontinued) or Copernic does this for file systems. It is almost as if every system-retrievable item inside a file (e.g. every word in a text document) automatica…
Re: TMSU is a tool for tagging your files
#46I've always wanted this for Windows. I wonder how hard it would be to port it. In a business setting, I often see people's desktops cluttered with files. It'd be nice to give them a virtual folder on the desktop where they can drag and drop files into in to it, with tags.
Re: TMSU is a tool for tagging your files
#47Hm. How could this be used efficiently for real work? I think because many of our tools are already file-based, this is not the greatest idea for uses cases that require structure. If anything tagging should be used along side hierarchical layouts...Or users should follow the standard of what /etc, /home, /lib and friends are used for. They are essentially tags in directory form. Take TMSU's example command: tmsu tag…
This quickly becomes cumbersome when you have dozens or hundreds of tags, and doesn't address tag values.
alice.jpg goes into alice/, and bob.jpg goes into bob/, but where do you put groupshot.jpg?
Re: TMSU is a tool for tagging your files
#48Re: TMSU is a tool for tagging your files
#49Re: TMSU is a tool for tagging your files
#50Earlier quoted context omitted.
I have a library of a lot of ebooks about a lot of subjects, I order them by folders, but is very common to have interesections on the topics they cover. I could tag all them with the folder name, and then manually tag the subtopics each book covers. edit: too bad it isn't on ubuntu repositories. I've a personal policy to avoid programs outside the repositories
Try Calibre for managing ebooks, it has a built-in tag system.