Earlier quoted context omitted.
Long time ago, e.g., Fisher Black was still alive (maybe he's not now). I hadn't yet heard of James Simons. The rumor I heard was that Simons liked to hire mathematical physicists from Russia. I had no way to go to Wall Street and already know all about everything they they were doing. The martgingale convergence theorem, measurable selection, power spectral estimation, sure, all about Wall Street, no. When I was in…
Sounds like you'd have been a much better fit for Renaissance Technologies than Goldman.
Sure, would've been great to have met Simons. Heck, I never got around to working in differential geometry but at one time did get the notes of S. S. Chern! And once tried to understand a seminar of an A. Gleason student! But I did cover exterior algebra, from both Fleming and Spivak. Now I have Cartan's book, now in English!
I have no idea just what Simons did to make his $12 billion or so, but likely it had to do with algorithmic trading in some sense.
Once I did get an interview at Morgan-Stanley, showed them some work I'd done in mathematical statistics, I later published, and mentioned that I'd like to work in the applied math of trading but got no interest.
The people on Wall Street made plenty of money and didn't need me.
So, I decided to go where I could make money just by pleasing users/customers -- do a start-up, i.e., hire myself.
From headhunters, I got a lot of just hostility: The main reaction was that in looking for a job I was doing something wrong. For another, my resume said I'd been a professor. Right, I had been. So, the head hunter got all twisted out of shape suggesting that I claimed the title of Full Professor. Nope, I claimed no such thing. The headhunter was eager to be nasty. Bizarre. Dysfunctional. Destructive. Nonsense.
I don't know what Wall Street wanted; I have to doubt that much of Wall Street knew what Wall Street wanted; whatever they did or didn't want, they didn't want me.
It's a very old problem: If working very high up, then are almost certainly (Simons is a grand exception) are working for people who, net, don't know measure theory. Then a person actually making use of such math will have a huge interpersonal interface problem.
Quite broadly one of the main bottlenecks in getting value from technical work is the problem of the awkward, often bitter, interface between a good technical person and a less technical superior.
I have heard that the lawyers have a solution here: A working lawyer is supposed to report only to a qualified lawyer.
Really, then, a technical person with some valuable technical work should just start their own business.
Or, how many people on Wall Street working as applied mathematicians and not for themselves earn money enough to live in a nice Manhattan townhouse or apartment? My guess is, not many and that, instead, the big bucks, say, for a $20 million townhouse, are going to non-technical people, management, sales, IB, trading, firm ownership, etc.