Live data from Hacker News

Are You a Robot? Introducing “No CAPTCHA ReCAPTCHA”

googleonlinesecurity.blogspot.com

311–320 of 442 posts

Re: Are You a Robot? Introducing “No CAPTCHA ReCAPTCHA”

#311
post #254

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Isn't this just the cost of having a "free" product? Bots are not really a problem. Its just that their traffic cannot be monetized. If you could monetize-bot traffic your problem would be solved. Or put another way, if you framed the issue as a business model one, not a technical one, it might be a useful exercise.

> if you framed the issue as a business model one, not > a technical one, it might be a useful exercise. That was kind of my point. Clearly most of the bots are trying to scrape my search engine for some specific data. I would (generally) be happy to just sell them that data rather than have them waste time trying to scrape us (that is the business model, which goes something like "Hey we have a copy of the big chunk…

If you wanted to buy data from Google, how would you email? What is Google's email address?

Re: Are You a Robot? Introducing “No CAPTCHA ReCAPTCHA”

#312

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Check out webvisum.com - from their website: "WebVisum is a unique browser add on which greatly enhances web accessibility and empowers the blind and visually impaired community by putting the control in your hands!" "Automated and instant CAPTCHA image solving, sign up to web sites and make forum posts and blog comments without asking for help!"

> Automated and instant CAPTCHA image solving How do they do that? This sounds like whitehat use of blackhat tools. Are they using captcha-solving farms?

They send the captcha to their servers and how they solve them is a secret.

http://www.webvisum.com/en/main/faq#q15

Re: Are You a Robot? Introducing “No CAPTCHA ReCAPTCHA”

#313
post #244
post #226

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've also tripped Google's bot filters. Frankly, I'm more offended that Google is discriminating against robots, seeing as they are one of the leading companies in automation and AI :-)

Though you were joking, it's worth noting they're certainly not discriminating against robots. They're discriminating against your robots. Which is to say: they're perfectly willing to let your crawl-able content and internet use help train their robots, they just don't want their crawl-able content and internet use to train your robots.

Aren't we talking about spambots, mostly? While law-abiding bots should probably be allowed in most sites, nobody wants a spambot in their blog or forum.

Isn't it right to block spambots? And if so, how do you tell regular bots from spambots?

Re: Are You a Robot? Introducing “No CAPTCHA ReCAPTCHA”

#314

I'm still more impressed by sites like http://www.funcaptcha.co/try-it/ Why have they not caught on?

I guess I know why they haven't caught on now...

Just curious - is it the game? or just the whole concept that you guys don't like?

Re: Are You a Robot? Introducing “No CAPTCHA ReCAPTCHA”

#315

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Check out webvisum.com - from their website: "WebVisum is a unique browser add on which greatly enhances web accessibility and empowers the blind and visually impaired community by putting the control in your hands!" "Automated and instant CAPTCHA image solving, sign up to web sites and make forum posts and blog comments without asking for help!"

> Automated and instant CAPTCHA image solving How do they do that? This sounds like whitehat use of blackhat tools. Are they using captcha-solving farms?

There are ways to solve captchas somewhat reliably programatically. I suspect this plugin only works on certain computer generated captchas, not the street sign ones.

http://resources.infosecinstitute.com/introduction-to-automa...

Re: Are You a Robot? Introducing “No CAPTCHA ReCAPTCHA”

#316

"If we can collect behavioural data from you, and it matches closely the behaviour of other humans, you are a human. Otherwise you're not a human." Does anyone else get that feeling from the description of what Google is doing? I've tripped their "we think you are a bot" detection filter and been presented with a captcha countless times while using complex search queries and searching for relatively obscure things, a…

> "I have JS and cookies disabled..."

Disabling essential parts of web functionality breaks web functionality. I'm shocked.

Dropping the snark though. I'm surprised that this is still a complaint. At this point in the web's evolution cookies and Javascript are essential. Disabling those will make your experience worse and complaining about that is like removing the windshield from a car and complaining that bugs get on your face.

Re: Are You a Robot? Introducing “No CAPTCHA ReCAPTCHA”

#317

Earlier quoted context omitted.

i'm sure no one at google thought about that

There's no call for sarcasm. Do you have more insight into what data could allow them to distinguish between bots and people? If you do please share, because the Wired article and Google's own marketing video don't provide much information - it's obviously more focused on marketing than the technology.

why would google voluntarily give up that information?

Re: Are You a Robot? Introducing “No CAPTCHA ReCAPTCHA”

#318

"If we can collect behavioural data from you, and it matches closely the behaviour of other humans, you are a human. Otherwise you're not a human." Does anyone else get that feeling from the description of what Google is doing? I've tripped their "we think you are a bot" detection filter and been presented with a captcha countless times while using complex search queries and searching for relatively obscure things, a…

> "I have JS and cookies disabled..." Disabling essential parts of web functionality breaks web functionality. I'm shocked. Dropping the snark though. I'm surprised that this is still a complaint. At this point in the web's evolution cookies and Javascript are essential. Disabling those will make your experience worse and complaining about that is like removing the windshield from a car and complaining that bugs get…

Tracking cookies are certainly not essential.

Re: Are You a Robot? Introducing “No CAPTCHA ReCAPTCHA”

#319
post #271

What am I missing? Breaking this looks much easier than a regular captcha... This is the sort of problem that genetic algorithms are well suited for (a small, well defined input domain with a binary oracle). You'd simply generate a random path, run a smoothing function over it, see if that works, then iterate. edit: does anyone know a site that is actually using this new widget? I only seem to be finding the older ve…

You're missing the fact that they're relying on many cues, not just mouse movement. I don't think they're even discolosing everything they use.

Re: Are You a Robot? Introducing “No CAPTCHA ReCAPTCHA”

#320

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> "I have JS and cookies disabled..." Disabling essential parts of web functionality breaks web functionality. I'm shocked. Dropping the snark though. I'm surprised that this is still a complaint. At this point in the web's evolution cookies and Javascript are essential. Disabling those will make your experience worse and complaining about that is like removing the windshield from a car and complaining that bugs get…

Tracking cookies are certainly not essential.

Yeah, tracking cookies might not be. But cookies in general? They're essential for a large amount of sites to handle something as simple as logins.
Post reply on HN