Live data from Hacker News

Wire – Modern Communications Network

wire.com

11–20 of 411 posts

Re: Wire – Modern Communications Network

#11
Skype has video chat. So far Wire only has audio. Skype can call a regular phone or receive calls from a regular phone. It seems like Wire can't, yet. Skype has all my contacts, Wire has none, yet.

Let's call it a Skype killer if it kills Skype. Not yet.

Re: Wire – Modern Communications Network

#13

"What we need is another messaging app" said nobody, ever. It looks pretty, but this is yet another app in the long list of "Skype killers" or "Voice/video/text" messaging. It seems like it's the default goto for anyone that can't think of something more interesting these days.

Agreed.

What we need is a protocol people can make clients for. With end to end encryption and PFS, of course.

Re: Wire – Modern Communications Network

#14

"What we need is another messaging app" said nobody, ever. It looks pretty, but this is yet another app in the long list of "Skype killers" or "Voice/video/text" messaging. It seems like it's the default goto for anyone that can't think of something more interesting these days.

I really disagree. There's simply no good secure cross-platform messaging app available.

Telegram has fantastic clients on all the platforms, but isn't secure. TextSecure is secure, but has only a mediocre app on a single platform (Android). The other alternatives are even worse.

Tox is looking really promising though: https://wiki.tox.im/FAQ

Re: Wire – Modern Communications Network

#16

"What we need is another messaging app" said nobody, ever. It looks pretty, but this is yet another app in the long list of "Skype killers" or "Voice/video/text" messaging. It seems like it's the default goto for anyone that can't think of something more interesting these days.

I really disagree. There's simply no good secure cross-platform messaging app available. Telegram has fantastic clients on all the platforms, but isn't secure. TextSecure is secure, but has only a mediocre app on a single platform (Android). The other alternatives are even worse. Tox is looking really promising though: https://wiki.tox.im/FAQ

Telegram isn't secure? Source please.

Re: Wire – Modern Communications Network

#17

Privacy agreements just a word without cryptographic technology background as supporter. Also "everwhere" not means "ios, osx, android". where is windows and linux desktop clients, even skype supports linux desktops today.

I'm most surprised to see a new application launch without a Windows client. Is this a conscious marketing decision to not target the Windows user market? Is the market share of iOS, Android and OSx enough for these guys to succeed without a Windows client? The website notes that a browser client is coming soon, but nothing for native Windows.

Re: Wire – Modern Communications Network

#18

"What we need is another messaging app" said nobody, ever. It looks pretty, but this is yet another app in the long list of "Skype killers" or "Voice/video/text" messaging. It seems like it's the default goto for anyone that can't think of something more interesting these days.

Exactly. Right now, I have installed on my phone:

* Standard text messaging app, for almost everyone.

* Google Hangouts, which is a pain to remove and always logs in behind my back. I don't want to chat on my phone, it's just a nuisance. (I wish people would stop talking to me through Hangouts, honestly)

* Viber, with a single contact.

* LINE, with a single contact.

I don't have WhatsApp or Snapchat or whatever, but most people will likely have 3 or more messaging apps.

3 years ago, everything was fine. Google used XMPP. Facebook used XMPP. Companies used XMPP. I used XMPP. I may have needed multiple accounts, but I needed only a single app. Now look where we are.

Re: Wire – Modern Communications Network

#19
While I welcome more competition since Skype really gone down hill after being bought by Microsoft, however this applications website doesn't give any useful information on the encryption used - it would be good to see if it supports OTR style encryption.
Post reply on HN