Martini is slow, try again with Negroni which is the new lib by the author of Martini.
Benchmarking Phoenix vs. Rails vs. Sinatra vs. Express vs. Martini
31–34 of 34 posts
Re: Benchmarking Phoenix vs. Rails vs. Sinatra vs. Express vs. Martini
#32Re: Benchmarking Phoenix vs. Rails vs. Sinatra vs. Express vs. Martini
#33Is elixir just a different syntax for erlang, or are the semantic differences? Their website doesn't seem to make it very clear.
Being able to use all of erlang's inbuilt modules and functions are an advantage. But there's way more to Elixir that just syntax. 1.) Elixir ships with a build tool called Mix. Falls back to use rebar for erlang projects. Mix is awesome and IMHO way more stable that rebar (Had problems with erlang libs shipping diff versions of rebar binaries in the git repo itself). 2.) There's a really good package manager - Hex.p…
You'd have to go with unix out of those options, F#'s pipe operator is just flipped function application, and is primarily to make up for the poor type inference F# has. Every functional language has or can easily have a function application operator.
Re: Benchmarking Phoenix vs. Rails vs. Sinatra vs. Express vs. Martini
#34Martini is not a good reflection on Go's performance (no pun intended). If you want a Go benchmark of a minimalistic framework, use Gorilla mux or even Beego