The stats presented by the article are very myopic. Bikes are mobile objects that frequently travel between areas covered by multiple precincts. Rather than looking solely at the 5th precinct, they arguably should have presented a wider view of the city's records on bicycle activity. When you do that, it paints a very different picture of some of the statistics. For instance - "cyclist accidents that caused deaths" :…
Is the NYPD About to Start Ticketing More Cyclists Due to a Mathematical Error?
21–30 of 142 posts
Re: Is the NYPD About to Start Ticketing More Cyclists Due to a Mathematical Error?
#22It's not a mathematical error when the number is completely fabricated to justify a policy change. That's just lying.
It's not really a policy change though is it? Aren't they enforcing laws that cyclists previously were breaking with impunity? I would like them to show their work too, but I don't really see the policy conspiracy angle to this.
If you've ever commuted via bike, you probably understand how little sense it makes to stop at every sign and roll no lights.
Re: Is the NYPD About to Start Ticketing More Cyclists Due to a Mathematical Error?
#23Big data does not mean big lies. If you make policy based on analyzing data you should be required to show your work.
Re: Is the NYPD About to Start Ticketing More Cyclists Due to a Mathematical Error?
#24Re: Is the NYPD About to Start Ticketing More Cyclists Due to a Mathematical Error?
#25Earlier quoted context omitted.
Exactly. No policies are changing. They're just putting more resources into enforcing existing laws.
They're rearranging the same resources from enforcing something else to enforcing traffic laws against bicyclists.
Re: Is the NYPD About to Start Ticketing More Cyclists Due to a Mathematical Error?
#26Even if the numbers are completely made up, I'm not going to be outraged that police decided to enforce laws that cyclists need to be abiding by anyway.
It's about the opportunity cost. What other thing could the police be doing instead of giving traffic tickets to cyclists? After all, the best case outcome of doing so is to reduce pedestrian injuries from 1 per year to 0 per year, which isn't much of a benefit. 16000 people were injured and 178 killed by cars in NYC in 2013. That's a much richer hunting ground for police activity.
Re: Is the NYPD About to Start Ticketing More Cyclists Due to a Mathematical Error?
#27It doesn't appear to be about safety, as the statistics clearly indicate that it's currently safe. It appears to be about making money and possibly discourage cycling.
Re: Is the NYPD About to Start Ticketing More Cyclists Due to a Mathematical Error?
#28Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's not really a policy change though is it? Aren't they enforcing laws that cyclists previously were breaking with impunity? I would like them to show their work too, but I don't really see the policy conspiracy angle to this.
It's not like police are an inexhaustible resource. Resources allocated in one realm means a dip in another. Using bad stats to justify a reallocation should be alarming to local residents.
Re: Is the NYPD About to Start Ticketing More Cyclists Due to a Mathematical Error?
#29They actually started towards the end of the summer, at least here in Brooklyn. Hadn't seen a biker get pulled over for things like not coming to a complete halt at stops signs in 3 years I've been here. Witnessed about 5 of them in the span of 3 weeks, heard about plenty more. I'm all for it. Casual bikers around here are not exactly fun to deal with.
I think one of the issues is that lots of people play fast and loose with the rules when moving about ... whether it be walking, bicycling or driving. And it's so easy to say "well I use this mode and I notice the people who use THAT mode are constantly breaking the rules and that's not safe!". If there's a demand to enforce the rules more stringently in the name of safety, would those doing the demanding also want t…
Re: Is the NYPD About to Start Ticketing More Cyclists Due to a Mathematical Error?
#30It's not necessarily a mathematical error. You can make any set of stats show pretty much anything you want. From that same data, one could conclude that collisions on bicycles only ever occur on intersections, and therefore we need to invest more in underpasses, which are completely safe, as this data shows no collisions in underpasses. Underpasses save lives.
Magic, eh?