Live data from Hacker News

Moving the joyent/libuv repository to libuv/libuv

github.com

11–20 of 39 posts

Re: Moving the joyent/libuv repository to libuv/libuv

#11
post #2

The behaviour of Joyent towards Ben Nordhuis left a very bad taste in my mouth last year. So I checked on the contributions to libuv [1] and it looks like he's back on the project. I wonder what happened? [1] https://github.com/libuv/libuv/commits?author=bnoordhuis

> The behaviour of Joyent towards Ben Nordhuis left a very bad taste in my mouth last year.

What happened?

Re: Moving the joyent/libuv repository to libuv/libuv

#12
post #2

The behaviour of Joyent towards Ben Nordhuis left a very bad taste in my mouth last year. So I checked on the contributions to libuv [1] and it looks like he's back on the project. I wonder what happened? [1] https://github.com/libuv/libuv/commits?author=bnoordhuis

> The behaviour of Joyent towards Ben Nordhuis left a very bad taste in my mouth last year. What happened?

[deleted]

Re: Moving the joyent/libuv repository to libuv/libuv

#13
post #2

The behaviour of Joyent towards Ben Nordhuis left a very bad taste in my mouth last year. So I checked on the contributions to libuv [1] and it looks like he's back on the project. I wonder what happened? [1] https://github.com/libuv/libuv/commits?author=bnoordhuis

> The behaviour of Joyent towards Ben Nordhuis left a very bad taste in my mouth last year. What happened?

Ben Noordhuis reverted a commit that had removed gendered language from libuv documentation:

https://github.com/joyent/libuv/commit/804d40e

Joyent received a lot of flak because people believe that Ben was a Joyent employee (he actually worked for Strongloop). Joyent came out with a post separating themselves from Ben, saying that they were in support of gender neutral language:

https://www.joyent.com/blog/the-power-of-a-pronoun

Re: Moving the joyent/libuv repository to libuv/libuv

#14
post #2

The behaviour of Joyent towards Ben Nordhuis left a very bad taste in my mouth last year. So I checked on the contributions to libuv [1] and it looks like he's back on the project. I wonder what happened? [1] https://github.com/libuv/libuv/commits?author=bnoordhuis

> The behaviour of Joyent towards Ben Nordhuis left a very bad taste in my mouth last year. What happened?

The ugly side of social coding happened.

Re: Moving the joyent/libuv repository to libuv/libuv

#15
post #2

The behaviour of Joyent towards Ben Nordhuis left a very bad taste in my mouth last year. So I checked on the contributions to libuv [1] and it looks like he's back on the project. I wonder what happened? [1] https://github.com/libuv/libuv/commits?author=bnoordhuis

> The behaviour of Joyent towards Ben Nordhuis left a very bad taste in my mouth last year. What happened?

[deleted]

Re: Moving the joyent/libuv repository to libuv/libuv

#16

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> The behaviour of Joyent towards Ben Nordhuis left a very bad taste in my mouth last year. What happened?

Ben Noordhuis reverted a commit that had removed gendered language from libuv documentation: https://github.com/joyent/libuv/commit/804d40e Joyent received a lot of flak because people believe that Ben was a Joyent employee (he actually worked for Strongloop). Joyent came out with a post separating themselves from Ben, saying that they were in support of gender neutral language: https://www.joyent.com/blog/the-power-…

Which is all well and good, but the author of that blog post, the one who stated he would not hesitate to fire Ben if he were an employee, has no problem mocking bisexuals in public presentations:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bGkVM1B5NuI#t=3059

To date, Bryan Cantrill remains CTO of Joyent. The corporate position appears to be that blatant homophobia by employees is acceptable, but improper pronouns are terminable offenses.

Re: Moving the joyent/libuv repository to libuv/libuv

#17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> The behaviour of Joyent towards Ben Nordhuis left a very bad taste in my mouth last year. What happened?

Ben Noordhuis reverted a commit that had removed gendered language from libuv documentation: https://github.com/joyent/libuv/commit/804d40e Joyent received a lot of flak because people believe that Ben was a Joyent employee (he actually worked for Strongloop). Joyent came out with a post separating themselves from Ben, saying that they were in support of gender neutral language: https://www.joyent.com/blog/the-power-…

I think that's quite one sided. He rejected the commit because the author didn't sign the contributors agreement. He was following the rules.

His crime was the tone of voice. I don't think it's worth forcing someone off a project for that.

Re: Moving the joyent/libuv repository to libuv/libuv

#18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Ben Noordhuis reverted a commit that had removed gendered language from libuv documentation: https://github.com/joyent/libuv/commit/804d40e Joyent received a lot of flak because people believe that Ben was a Joyent employee (he actually worked for Strongloop). Joyent came out with a post separating themselves from Ben, saying that they were in support of gender neutral language: https://www.joyent.com/blog/the-power-…

I think that's quite one sided. He rejected the commit because the author didn't sign the contributors agreement. He was following the rules. His crime was the tone of voice. I don't think it's worth forcing someone off a project for that.

> I think that's quite one sided.

IMO argentpyro explained the incident in a pretty neutral manner.

Re: Moving the joyent/libuv repository to libuv/libuv

#19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Ben Noordhuis reverted a commit that had removed gendered language from libuv documentation: https://github.com/joyent/libuv/commit/804d40e Joyent received a lot of flak because people believe that Ben was a Joyent employee (he actually worked for Strongloop). Joyent came out with a post separating themselves from Ben, saying that they were in support of gender neutral language: https://www.joyent.com/blog/the-power-…

Which is all well and good, but the author of that blog post, the one who stated he would not hesitate to fire Ben if he were an employee, has no problem mocking bisexuals in public presentations: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bGkVM1B5NuI#t=3059 To date, Bryan Cantrill remains CTO of Joyent. The corporate position appears to be that blatant homophobia by employees is acceptable, but improper pronouns are terminable…

That's extraordinarily hypocritical when you compare it to his blog post. That joke was completely inappropriate.

http://www.joyent.com/blog/the-power-of-a-pronoun

Re: Moving the joyent/libuv repository to libuv/libuv

#20
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think that's quite one sided. He rejected the commit because the author didn't sign the contributors agreement. He was following the rules. His crime was the tone of voice. I don't think it's worth forcing someone off a project for that.

> I think that's quite one sided. IMO argentpyro explained the incident in a pretty neutral manner.

Actually reading that particular conversation about the commit (there were several) does demonstrate the reasons for reverting the commit.

(And the amazing speed at which things escalated)

Post reply on HN