Microsoft takes .NET open source and cross-platform
201–210 of 937 posts
Re: Microsoft takes .NET open source and cross-platform
#202Too little, too late. At the end of the day, you're still being forced to pay a company to use their shitty software. Once you lose developers, you lose the race.
The thing is, it's anything but shitty. C# is one of the best languages out there for generic enterprise work and app development, and there's a magnigicent next gen language in F# thrown in, and a great web framework.
Re: Microsoft takes .NET open source and cross-platform
#203Re: Microsoft takes .NET open source and cross-platform
#204Earlier quoted context omitted.
System.Console isn't something that most apps rely on. It's handy for printing something out in a tiny one-file test app, but generally not relied upon for bigger apps.
Are you saying core .NET libraries are worthless? Because in that case what's the point? Why not just use Java.
Re: Microsoft takes .NET open source and cross-platform
#205http://techcrunch.com/2014/11/12/microsoft-takes-net-open-so...
Re: Microsoft takes .NET open source and cross-platform
#206I know it's silly but I'm tearing up. I grew up with .NET but neglected it for years because of moving to OS X, iOS and web dev. I played for some time with Xamarin and I'm so happy this is where MS is going. a lot to do with it.
Is this Microsoft's runtime or Miguel's? I can't work out whether: - he's made it (if Mono is everywhere and now blessed by Microsoft) - he's ruined (if Microsoft's original Windows-only .net runtime is now everywhere, and there's no need for Mono) EDIT: apparently it's both - https://twitter.com/shanselman/status/532558786486370304
Re: Microsoft takes .NET open source and cross-platform
#207Re: Microsoft takes .NET open source and cross-platform
#208Re: Microsoft takes .NET open source and cross-platform
#209http://techcrunch.com/2014/11/12/microsoft-takes-net-open-so...