Apparently, I'm not a real person ... :(
Hater News – Now for Twitter and Reddit
21–30 of 50 posts
Re: Hater News – Now for Twitter and Reddit
#22I'm not sure how my tweet of "Nothing encourages you to finally fix your backups like a kernel panic during a OS update." qualifies as hate?
Re: Hater News – Now for Twitter and Reddit
#23Re: Hater News – Now for Twitter and Reddit
#24The Worst Comment* "How many languages you know - that many times you are a human."
I guess I hit the key words of calling something "fat," and dropping the f-bomb.
The "troll rate" across all my accounts is 3.X.. which is interesting. Because I'm definitely a little more.. "lively" on some accounts than others (for instance HN compared to Reddit). I would have expected one to be much higher than the other.
Re: Hater News – Now for Twitter and Reddit
#25Apparently, I'm not a real person ... :(
Re: Hater News – Now for Twitter and Reddit
#26Apparently, I'm not a real person ... :(
This seems to be the default error message that's shown when the queue's too full to analyse a user. Which is probably not a great thing when the site's busy being upvoted on HN.
Basically, get them to change the subject of Godwin's Law.
Re: Hater News – Now for Twitter and Reddit
#27Re: Hater News – Now for Twitter and Reddit
#28Re: Hater News – Now for Twitter and Reddit
#29Sample: http://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/6dnve/Top%20Comedi... is broken because it has a slash in the title (9/11)
Killing that slash fixes it: http://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/6dnve/Top%20Comedi...
Re: Hater News – Now for Twitter and Reddit
#30And the results for HN are truly head-scratching. Use of the word "fucking" regardless of context is apparently enough to elevate a comment to "worst" status. (Watch me get a few points just for this comment alone!)
Don't get me wrong, this is a neat tool, but it's going to be misused in character assassinations on others, especially with its current presentation, where phrases are used like "troll score", "most insulting" and so on.
I'd really suggest toning that presentation down and emphasizing the fact that this is imperfect until the algorithm has been tweaked further.