WireEdit – A Full Stack WYSIWYG Editor for Network Packets
1–10 of 82 posts
Re: WireEdit – A Full Stack WYSIWYG Editor for Network Packets
#2No native Linux support (Win7 binary "+ hacked version of WINE"). Makers request it be run on "Ubuntu 14.4 x32"[sic] only, not even x86_64. I suspect they mean x86, or 32-bit when they say x32, since the x32 ABI is nowhere near implemented.
No source, no privacy policy. Supporting new protocols/formats/stack requires one 'to talk about it' with them.
Re: WireEdit – A Full Stack WYSIWYG Editor for Network Packets
#3This looks really cool. Whenever I open up my Networks textbook, I get nostalgic about this stuff. It'd be fun to easily create my own packets to test out different stuff I've learned.
... any idea on a Mac version?
Re: WireEdit – A Full Stack WYSIWYG Editor for Network Packets
#4You should add the licence on the website. It's a nice concept but I'll start using it as soon as someone creates a FOSS clone.
Re: WireEdit – A Full Stack WYSIWYG Editor for Network Packets
#5Not open source = not at all like WireShark, sorry.
And that's a damn shame. I could see a community growing around this kind of thing and adding all kinds of protocol support to it, if only it was open source.
Re: WireEdit – A Full Stack WYSIWYG Editor for Network Packets
#6No native Linux support (Win7 binary "+ hacked version of WINE"). Makers request it be run on "Ubuntu 14.4 x32"[sic] only, not even x86_64. I suspect they mean x86, or 32-bit when they say x32, since the x32 ABI is nowhere near implemented. No source, no privacy policy. Supporting new protocols/formats/stack requires one 'to talk about it' with them.
1) Have Ubuntu12.04x32 with hacked WINE working as well. Let me know if you need it.
2) No source indeed.
3) Privacy policy is stated in the EULA. I'll repeat it here: "No info is gathered, no connections to outside servers, except for a standard WINE repository".
Re: WireEdit – A Full Stack WYSIWYG Editor for Network Packets
#7Not open source = not at all like WireShark, sorry. And that's a damn shame. I could see a community growing around this kind of thing and adding all kinds of protocol support to it, if only it was open source.
No competition with WireShark is intended. WireEdit is a packet editor, not an analyzer. Can as easily edit a .txt Hex dump of a packet (not yet supported, but easy to do).
Re: WireEdit – A Full Stack WYSIWYG Editor for Network Packets
#8No native Linux support (Win7 binary "+ hacked version of WINE"). Makers request it be run on "Ubuntu 14.4 x32"[sic] only, not even x86_64. I suspect they mean x86, or 32-bit when they say x32, since the x32 ABI is nowhere near implemented. No source, no privacy policy. Supporting new protocols/formats/stack requires one 'to talk about it' with them.
Added the stated above privacy policy to website FAQ.
Re: WireEdit – A Full Stack WYSIWYG Editor for Network Packets
#9No native Linux support (Win7 binary "+ hacked version of WINE"). Makers request it be run on "Ubuntu 14.4 x32"[sic] only, not even x86_64. I suspect they mean x86, or 32-bit when they say x32, since the x32 ABI is nowhere near implemented. No source, no privacy policy. Supporting new protocols/formats/stack requires one 'to talk about it' with them.
Today it's x86 only.
Re: WireEdit – A Full Stack WYSIWYG Editor for Network Packets
#10This looks really cool. Whenever I open up my Networks textbook, I get nostalgic about this stuff. It'd be fun to easily create my own packets to test out different stuff I've learned. ... any idea on a Mac version?
Yes. Will take a while.