Earlier quoted context omitted.
I find it interesting that Brian Cox, the presenter and avowed scientist, obviously finds it so 'surprising' as well. Maybe that's the true meaning of being a scientist, though - he doesn't truly believe it until observing it with his own eyes.
>Brian Cox, the presenter and avowed scientist, I think you mean "Brian Cox: Professor of High-energy Particle Physics, member of the High Energy Physics group at the University of Manchester, and the ATLAS experiment at the Large Hadron Collider at CERN (who also presents popular science programmes in the UK)" I think his career as a scientist deserves a little more recognition than "avowed". And, as for his career…
The hammer-feather drop in the world’s biggest vacuum chamber [video]
41–50 of 124 posts
Re: The hammer-feather drop in the world’s biggest vacuum chamber [video]
#42I wish the producers were less enamoured of their slow-mo and showed us the whole thing in real-time. The "weird" thing is seeing feathers plummet to the ground and I wish we got to see more of that.
This is a Brian Cox show we're talking about, not a science show. I'm surprised there weren't more slow mo shots of Cox doing his "boyish wonder" face.
Re: The hammer-feather drop in the world’s biggest vacuum chamber [video]
#43Earlier quoted context omitted.
From another perspective, these technologies left us with little science of utility (Tang?) while developing intercontinental ballistic missiles that loom over humanity like the Sword of Damocles. When historians from far off planets visit our nuclear wasteland they will see our thinly veiled space program as the beginning of end. :-)
Quick list of more inventions that are not Tang http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NASA_spin-off_technologies
Now, if they hadn't developed it, someone else probably would, but perhaps not at that time - leaving us at years behind where we currently are with e.g. the speeds on our mobile devices.
Re: The hammer-feather drop in the world’s biggest vacuum chamber [video]
#44Re: The hammer-feather drop in the world’s biggest vacuum chamber [video]
#45Re: The hammer-feather drop in the world’s biggest vacuum chamber [video]
#46Earlier quoted context omitted.
And for the violently impatient, the actual drop: http://youtu.be/E43-CfukEgs?t=2m52s
Fortunately you beat me to it. I was going to post the later sequence at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E43-CfukEgs&feature=youtu.be... But on closer viewing that is a disastrous montage: the first few seconds (before cut away) show the feathers fluttering and the bowling ball starting to accelerate away; the slow-motion segue is under vacuum conditions though. The film editor's intention is that the two shots appe…
This is true for the big ball too, except that the speed of sound is orders of magnitude faster in it, and the spring constant of the material (steel?) is also many order of magnitude larger than the spring constant of the feather.
The center of mass of both objects falls at the same rate. At t=0, d^2x/dt^2=0 for the points closer to the ground and d^2x/dt^2=2g for the points that were just unhooked. Also see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mAA613hqqZ0
Re: The hammer-feather drop in the world’s biggest vacuum chamber [video]
#47Commander David Scott did this same experiment as part of Apollo 15 in August of 1971, in an even larger vacuum: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KDp1tiUsZw8
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8556363
The text of the site I submitted has kindly been posted by DanBC[0] here:
Re: The hammer-feather drop in the world’s biggest vacuum chamber [video]
#48I wish the producers were less enamoured of their slow-mo and showed us the whole thing in real-time. The "weird" thing is seeing feathers plummet to the ground and I wish we got to see more of that.
Re: The hammer-feather drop in the world’s biggest vacuum chamber [video]
#49I know how this will turn out but my intuition is screaming otherwise.
Re: The hammer-feather drop in the world’s biggest vacuum chamber [video]
#50I guess this is a pretty superficial complaint, but this is a 2nd-generation clickbait-site link (posted on io9, reposted on thekidsshouldseethis.com). Why not post the Youtube link directly? This isn't really Hacker News material, anyway.
Especially since the linked site is starting to hit resource limits. I had to refresh a few times before it would load. Here's the youtube link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E43-CfukEgs