New Startup Raises $100M for Portable Ultrasound
technologyreview.com
New Startup Raises $100M for Portable Ultrasound
1–10 of 43 posts
Re: New Startup Raises $100M for Portable Ultrasound
#2In terms of portable ultrasound, there are a few existing solutions on the market:
This looks pretty portable (connected to an iPhone too): http://www.mobisante.com/
GE's portable ultrasound seems pretty portable too: http://www3.gehealthcare.com/en/Products/Categories/Ultrasou...
Best of luck to Rothberg et al., I believe there's a huge consumer market for a portable ultrasound done right! The pregnancy market alone is vast, e.g. https://www.bellabeat.com/
Re: New Startup Raises $100M for Portable Ultrasound
#3Re: New Startup Raises $100M for Portable Ultrasound
#410 minutes of ultrasound to diagnose a serious illness can cost several hundred dollars in the USA
Maybe in a decade it can even be built into smartphones like a tricorder.
This device already looks like it can plug into a smartphone http://www.mobisante.com/products/product-overview/
Re: New Startup Raises $100M for Portable Ultrasound
#5Hope they destroy the industry. 10 minutes of ultrasound to diagnose a serious illness can cost several hundred dollars in the USA Maybe in a decade it can even be built into smartphones like a tricorder. This device already looks like it can plug into a smartphone http://www.mobisante.com/products/product-overview/
Re: New Startup Raises $100M for Portable Ultrasound
#6His two DNA sequencing companies (454 and Ion torrent) have both had what I would consider successful exits (solid to Roche and Life technologies respectively). But more importantly both products made their way into the hands of consumers (which is actually rare for DNA sequencing startups). However after acquisition both products failed to gain significant traction (Roche has just shelved 454).
He also engages in a certain amount of showmanship [1], which has as gained him some ridicule. I think he has to be respected to successfully executing in a market where most startups fizzle out though.
I hope this pans out though, it sounds awesome. I really hope this (and other research/medical device) technology makes its way into the hands of normal consumers (not just research labs/medical institutes).
[1] Oh and he has a scale model of Stonehenge in his back yard. http://clonehenge.com/2009/01/17/circle-of-life-connecticuts...
Re: New Startup Raises $100M for Portable Ultrasound
#7http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex-selective_abortion
Though there is a lot being done against this social evil, it is still very prevalent.
Re: New Startup Raises $100M for Portable Ultrasound
#8Hope they destroy the industry. 10 minutes of ultrasound to diagnose a serious illness can cost several hundred dollars in the USA Maybe in a decade it can even be built into smartphones like a tricorder. This device already looks like it can plug into a smartphone http://www.mobisante.com/products/product-overview/
The price in medicine is mostly not the hardware but the required expertise to analyse the data. Ultrasound imaging is not easy. The american health system is very expensive though, a ultrasound is around 50 euro's here.
That said, 3D ultrasound can have tons of other applications not just in diagnostic medicine. Real time surgcial feedback in soft tissue, yes please!
Re: New Startup Raises $100M for Portable Ultrasound
#9On the darker side, a dangerous social impact that this device would have is an increase female foeticide http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex-selective_abortion Though there is a lot being done against this social evil, it is still very prevalent.
Why would a cheaper technology lead to an increase in abortions? Don't they just kill the fetus anyway upon realization of the sex if it's undesirable?
Wouldn't it ultimately be safer for the mother, to perform a very early term abortion if that's what she wants, rather than waiting?
If a mother wants to abort at 60 days pregnant (assuming the new tech enables earlier sex identification), why shouldn't she be allowed to for any reason she deems worthy?
Re: New Startup Raises $100M for Portable Ultrasound
#10On the darker side, a dangerous social impact that this device would have is an increase female foeticide http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex-selective_abortion Though there is a lot being done against this social evil, it is still very prevalent.
A few questions. Why would a cheaper technology lead to an increase in abortions? Don't they just kill the fetus anyway upon realization of the sex if it's undesirable? Wouldn't it ultimately be safer for the mother, to perform a very early term abortion if that's what she wants, rather than waiting? If a mother wants to abort at 60 days pregnant (assuming the new tech enables earlier sex identification), why shouldn…
If this device is cheap/small enough that illegal clinics could have it, it would make gender identification much more widely available then it is now.
Selective abortion can be dangerous population-wise because even a small gender skew can be hugely problematic.