Live data from Hacker News

A Theory on Hacker News

blog.cubbyscott.com

21–27 of 27 posts

Re: A Theory on Hacker News

#21

"It's pretty easy to follow user behavior on Hacker News, they click the first link, read the content go back to Hacker News comment if they found the link interesting" I think you're wrong here. I'd wager most people check the comments before reading the link (if there are comments).

I do just the opposite of this: I click links from the bottom up on the front page, and often only look at the comments.

Re: A Theory on Hacker News

#22

"It's pretty easy to follow user behavior on Hacker News, they click the first link, read the content go back to Hacker News comment if they found the link interesting" I think you're wrong here. I'd wager most people check the comments before reading the link (if there are comments).

There are headlines in which I'm only interested in the comments (usually because I've seen the article or already know a lot about the subject and don't expect to learn anything from the article), but on headlines where I am interested in both, I usually open both the comments and the article in different tabs, and read each while the other is open, but in an order that depends strongly on the day and the content.

If, for example, I find something surprising or incredible in the article, I'll often switch to the comments to see if it was mentioned or debunked, before continuing.

Re: A Theory on Hacker News

#23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In fact, I wish the link in my google gadget went to the comments page first and not the submitted link.

There have been a few people who have created Yahoo pipes which do just that; this is the only link I can seem to come up with, but should do what you want: http://pipes.yahoo.com/andrewducker/hackernews

sweet, upvoted.

Re: A Theory on Hacker News

#24
At times I feel my "behaviour" is limited by the interface - I'd like to read both comments and the article side by side so I can reference comments to particular sections in the article / site.

At other times I wished a side-by-side option was available on the front page - think of the front page as a table-of-contents, then have a frame on the right where the article (or comments) can be displayed - would save a lot of reloads, as I tend to do a session of (look at items -> look at article 1 -> back to items -> article 4 etc etc)

Re: A Theory on Hacker News

#25
When i click a link I would love to see a digg style frame or bar on top (for voting) and another one at the bottom with the comments (for reading and commenting). And the website in the middle. This way you can prevent going back and forth or trying to vote on a story and seeing the noprocrast page because you left the tab open for too long.

Maybe i should just do a gresemonkey script or something that behaves this way ...

Re: A Theory on Hacker News

#26
post #7

"It's pretty easy to follow user behavior on Hacker News, they click the first link, read the content go back to Hacker News comment if they found the link interesting" I think you're wrong here. I'd wager most people check the comments before reading the link (if there are comments).

I would of loved to add comments in there, but there is no way of getting them barring html scrapping. HN Feature Request: RSS feed for comments of an item.

I'd like to add to that: an RSS feed for replies to your own comments.

Re: A Theory on Hacker News

#27

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Well I must be a weirdo then, I prefer to at the very least glance at the source before seeing opinions on the source. I do check the comments immediately afterwards because some of them are pure gold! :)

You're not alone. I scan the list of top stories, open new tabs in my browser alternating between source and comments, as many as 10 at a time. I always scan the source first for context but, like others here, generally find that the comments are more interesting.

This is _exactly_ how I browse too! :D
Post reply on HN