Live data from Hacker News

In Search of Uber’s Unicorn

slate.com

71–72 of 72 posts

Re: In Search of Uber’s Unicorn

#71
post #3

Unless I'm missing something, the claim that becoming a taxi driver can become a well-salaried, middle-class job for a significant number of people is patent nonsense . There is a reason that taxis look the way they do and are driven by the people who currently drive them, and regulations and licensing is only a small part of that. Uber might disrupt the taxi industry, maybe for the better, but once equilibrium is re…

> Given the sheer volume of demand for rides, the relative ease of copying this service, and the number of cars owned by Americans, I don't see how their large revenues can be anything other than temporary.

I think part of it is a bet that individual car ownership will decrease with technology, which I think is a great bet. Not to say that investing in Uber is the best way to bet on that.

Re: In Search of Uber’s Unicorn

#72

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Even if it's raw revenue...where are the 100s of drivers making that much that Uber claims exist?

Could this be, hmm, not so much lying as willful ignorance? There are probably middle-men in the Uber industry just as there are middle-men in the taxi industry, who own a car and pay people to drive it with Uber. If they have one account per car, the account could me making $100k / year via driving 24/7, and Uber could be choosing to believe that these accounts represent a single self-employed driver.

Being a middleman would be extremely hard as you have to provide a profile picture and passengers use the picture to verify they have the correct driver.
Post reply on HN