Failed to load resource: net::ERR_CACHE_MISS in portugal
That's a Chrome bug, though it's probably still down for you:
Is Facebook really down?
31–38 of 38 posts
Re: Is Facebook really down?
#32I like collecting downtime for big websites :) https://timelinee.com/t/aan6iH/
Facebook theoretically loses about $22,453 for every minute it’s down around the globe. The average yearly programmer salary is generated about every four minutes. Neat.
I need to give TechCrunch the credit for the number $22,453:
Re: Is Facebook really down?
#33Earlier quoted context omitted.
Facebook theoretically loses about $22,453 for every minute it’s down around the globe. The average yearly programmer salary is generated about every four minutes. Neat.
That number seems relatively cheap for me. I guess it's a little over that if it's worldwide, no? Not to mention related values like stock prices, etc...
sillysaurus3 said every 4 minutes, meaning the salary would be somewhere between $80k-$90k, which is pretty reasonable.
Re: Is Facebook really down?
#34Does Facebook ever do postmortems?
Re: Is Facebook really down?
#35Answers better https://downdetector.co.uk/problems/facebook Edit: just wondering how long until downdetecter will go down
We are in need of a downdetector downdetector.
Re: Is Facebook really down?
#36I like collecting downtime for big websites :) https://timelinee.com/t/aan6iH/
Facebook theoretically loses about $22,453 for every minute it’s down around the globe. The average yearly programmer salary is generated about every four minutes. Neat.
Facebook has 7,185 employees as of June 30th, 2014. Assuming the average salary is $100,000 (They aren't all developers). It means that facebook makes enough money to pay all it's employees for the year in 22 and a half days.
Re: Is Facebook really down?
#37Does Facebook ever do postmortems?
This is what I want to know. I'm not an expert with ChromeTools, but I was able to determine the following:
1. Viewing the page source showed that only maybe a few dozen lines of html were being retrieved. Stopped somewhere in the million scripts in the .
2. More interestingly, the Network pane showed 200s across the board... no resource was being requested that wasn't being served.
So, the servers were simply serving up a tenth of the web page? Is that it? It seems as though some internal generation of the html pooped out before finishing. No HTTP errors because nothing in the html that we received requested anything that wasn't already there.
Re: Is Facebook really down?
#38Does Facebook ever do postmortems?
Publicly? Rarely. (Here's an example, though, from 2010: https://www.facebook.com/notes/facebook-engineering/more-det...)
Internally? Absolutely, for, at minimum, every user-visible outage.