Live data from Hacker News

What's missing in reddit/digg: a way to see which side won an argument in discussions

news.ycombinator.com

11–20 of 26 posts

Re: What's missing in reddit/digg: a way to see which side won an argument in discussions

#11
Personally, I think most online discussions are bankrupt. It's time to scrap the whole approach and start fresh. It's not close to how we share knowledge in the real world and simply stating and reading opinions is nothing more than good entertainment.

Re: What's missing in reddit/digg: a way to see which side won an argument in discussions

#13
Maybe you should do this in a meta-site like Disqus, that'd be interesting. I could see why a site like Reddit/Digg wouldn't want to add a feature like this, it would probably encourage the wrong sort of behavior.

But human nature is human nature, there's always going to be a market for a pissing contest, why not capture it? :D

Re: What's missing in reddit/digg: a way to see which side won an argument in discussions

#14
post #9

"Winning an argument is like winning at the Special Olympics. Sure you won, but you're still retarded."

This comment is no more funny or insightful than it was 5 years ago. Worse, it discourages positive contributions as well as negative.

Positive contributions usually don't spark arguments. Even if they're controversial or unpopular, they tend to spark discussion instead.

Re: What's missing in reddit/digg: a way to see which side won an argument in discussions

#15
Perhaps comments could be tagged and any +1 or -1 to a comment would trickle down to all of those tags? Would people take the time to tag comments?

You'd need a way to boil down the answer choices in order to declare a clear cut winner. By boiling it down, you take the personality and shades out gray out of the comment you'd be voting on and therefore much of the value.

Also, if the winning side is a "pro life" tag and you are pro choice, you are unlikely to see much value or be swayed by the vote. I would see such a vote as dumbed down and dig into the comments for the 'real' content.

Re: What's missing in reddit/digg: a way to see which side won an argument in discussions

#19
post #6
post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Online discussions can go on forever. But if you keep score, one side might consider giving up if it is obvious that it is losing.

What if the side that's losing is right?

Welcome to democracy @work ;)

Re: What's missing in reddit/digg: a way to see which side won an argument in discussions

#20
post #7
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What if the side that's losing is right?

They did not make their case well or perhaps the forum is not an appropriate one. They can try again in another debate.

So, is it working yet?
Post reply on HN