My First Keyboard Build
31–40 of 82 posts
Re: My First Keyboard Build
#32About the column wiring: You can buy ptfe sleeving and single core uninsulated wire. PTFE won't melt. Here's one example, it comes in a bunch of sizes and usually in 5 m lengths. Really great write-up btw!
I'd extend the insulation remark that the cognitive load should be spread. So a hundred identical simple diodes should have insulation slipped on all of them and then the somewhat more cognitively challenging job of individual column wiring can just be bare wire. Another suggestion is I've never built a keyboard but I've done weird LED arrays and one trick to pre bend all the leads the same way, involves a chunk of s…
Re: My First Keyboard Build
#33Has anyone built a DataHand or something else that "reinvents" the keyboard? This is already two decades old. http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/DataHand
Re: My First Keyboard Build
#34Has anyone built a DataHand or something else that "reinvents" the keyboard? This is already two decades old. http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/DataHand
There's an ongoing effort by someone to recreate it: http://geekhack.org/index.php?topic=41422.0
Re: My First Keyboard Build
#35Excellent build quality, but I was surprised by these two statements on things you need: A decent soldering iron. You will thank yourself later. Also note: you will burn yourself many times throughout the build. Might as well do it with a fancy iron! LEADED SOLDER – I started the build without leaded solder and oh dear… If you have a "decent soldering iron", then lead-free solder shouldn't be a problem. Also, if you…
Source.
I live in the EU and 60/40 is still the most common solder for hobbyists, and is sold everywhere.
Re: My First Keyboard Build
#36Like OP, I have found the state of free CAD software bit disappointing, moreso for libre ones. So far my favorite has been the free 2D version of SolidEdge, but it has its quirks and like the name implies it doesn't do 3D at all.
Re: My First Keyboard Build
#37Re: My First Keyboard Build
#38It's not perfect, mind you: the thumb islands are three buttons wide, and my thumb rests on the innermost button. And I have hands larger than average; I don't know how someone with smaller hands would find the board. Also, because of the layout changes, some keys (the square braces, enter, - and =) have to be moved somewhere else; the buttons you're used to pressing just aren't there.
There are some tiny parts; if you buy it, get a head-mounted magnifier with a light, like this one: http://www.amazon.com/SE-MH1047L-Illuminated-Multipower-Magn... . I don't know how I would've been able to surface-mount the tiny diodes without it.
Obviously, the downside to having a keyboard with radically different placements of buttons is that going to other keyboards becomes difficult again. I haven't solved this problem, but might end up buying a second one for work.
Re: My First Keyboard Build
#39Has anyone built a DataHand or something else that "reinvents" the keyboard? This is already two decades old. http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/DataHand
Re: My First Keyboard Build
#40If I were to build a keyboard I would definitely take a couple of ideas from typematrix. First of all, staggered keys make absolutely no sense(unles it's actually a typewriter). It takes a week to get used to a straight layout, and it feels more natural. It's not a problem to switch between staggered and matrix layouts either. Second thing I would copy is having enter and backspace between the two halves of the keybo…
> and it feels more natural I've always wondered about this - I don't disbelieve that some people feel this way, but is it really a general consensus? And is there a reason we should expect it, I don't see why staggered keys make fundamentally less sense.
I would say it is a consensus among people who have used non-staggered layouts for a sustained period - the benefits are definitely noticeable to someone with RSI too.
People are satisfied with their keyboard layout because it's good enough for them, and they've not experienced using other layouts enough to compare the benefits. It's very much like PGs "blub paradox", in which the a typist becomes familiar enough with his keyboard that other, allegedly better keyboards seem like only minor improvements - not worth the effort to switch. For most people, this is probably the case - it's only if you're typing for several hours a day that there will be tangible benefits to hand-optimized layouts.