Live data from Hacker News

How Apple’s Siri Became One Autistic Boy's B.F.F

nytimes.com

81–84 of 84 posts

Re: How Apple’s Siri Became One Autistic Boy's B.F.F

#81

This story should be an inspiration for the 21-st century version of the "Little Prince" st. Expury.

The Little Prince was about friendship between creatures that need each other. That's actually one of the main ideas of the book: we need each other. From my experience developing a Robin (a product not unlike Siri), I can tell you: yes, some users really adopt the machine as a pet to an extreme degree, but I don't envy these people.

Re: How Apple’s Siri Became One Autistic Boy's B.F.F

#82
post #14
post #9

Wow, what a piece! I am incredibly impressed with the range of responses that Siri has. I wonder just how many questions they've entered responses to. Certainly some stuff can be learned, but responding to requests to marriage is certainly written at some level by a human.

Almost certainly they special-case some inputs -- have you ever recited the Konami Code to Siri? What amazes me is sheer variety of questions that people ask Siri that s/he can now answer humorously. It wouldn't surprise me if they watch the number of queries (from actual users) that don't get an answer and/or fall back to Wolfram Alpha to see if there are any new ones that need special treatment. That said, most of…

To be fair, most of the information that I spit out was "written at some level by a human", such as the Wikipedia articles I've memorized, or the Hacker News comments I rephrase.

Re: How Apple’s Siri Became One Autistic Boy's B.F.F

#83

This is a great article that highlights some things people have been thinking about for a while (starting with Isaac Asimov), but haven't been much of an immediate concern until now: namely the nature of artificial intelligence and our relationship with it. We could consider the emergence of a friendship like this a milestone, a bit like when chess AI got good enough to beat a typical club player, but wasn't quite re…

This issue is commonly considered to be far-off or irrelevant due to the difficulty of developing strong AI, but I think that the reasoning behind that judgement is faulty.

We are unlikely to develop strong AI any time soon, but it is far easier to create the convincing impression of sentience. Humans are naturally prone to pareidolia and the pathetic fallacy - we see faces in potato chips, we convince ourselves that a faulty photocopier hates us, we attribute personality traits to automobiles.

Looking back to the 1960s, many people experienced strong emotions when interacting with ELIZA, a program that is laughably simple by modern standards. Today, there are numerous accounts of soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan holding funerals for bomb disposal robots and decorating them with honorary medals.

Machines don't need to be as intelligent as humans for us to begin forming deep attachments to them, they don't need to pass the Turing test, they don't even need to match the intelligence of a cat or dog - they only need to appear plausibly sentient, which I think is a far lower bar than most of us realise.

Personally, I think we're on the cusp of a profound change in how we interact with computers. We'll see it first in cases like these, people with limited capacity for reasoning - children, the learning disabled, elderly people suffering from cognitive decline. Machines that aren't smart enough to fool a skeptical observer, but that represent a perfectly satisfactory stand-in for Rex or Tiddles. The natural human tendency to see patterns and project ourselves onto the world will meet the machines in the middle, glossing over their deficiencies.

We'll dismiss it at first, framing it as the slightly pitiable self-delusions of the vulnerable and lonely. Change will come imperceptibly gradually, creeping in from the edges as the technology improves and filters out into the world. We won't really notice that society is being reshaped, just as there was no shocking moment of realisation that a whole generation had grown up with ubiquitous access to communication technology. We'll just have a vague "huh?" moment, like the first time you were sat on a train and realised that nearly everyone on board was staring at a small glowing rectangle. Huh, my elderly mother spends most of her time talking to a bot. Huh, my child's best friend is a bot. Huh, these students are passing around a petition for bot rights. Huh.

Re: How Apple’s Siri Became One Autistic Boy's B.F.F

#84

This is a great article that highlights some things people have been thinking about for a while (starting with Isaac Asimov), but haven't been much of an immediate concern until now: namely the nature of artificial intelligence and our relationship with it. We could consider the emergence of a friendship like this a milestone, a bit like when chess AI got good enough to beat a typical club player, but wasn't quite re…

I don't know if you've played Shadow of Mordor, but even as an occasional game developer like yourself I was able to forget about the technology running the Nemesis System at times and treat the Orc Chiefs as though they had intelligence and history. You can easily imagine how that system works when you take a step back, but if something even at that stage can trick us I have high hopes for the next few years of AI / NPC programming in the next few years.

On a related topic, a lot of money has gone into graphics programming in the last few years as studios developed their own engines in anticipation of the now-current generation of consoles. I am hopeful that with virtual reality on the horizon we'll see improvements in AI and Physics, among other tech necessary to create a convincing virtual world.

Post reply on HN